These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12589448)

  • 1. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of color word availability on the Stroop color-naming effect.
    Kim H; Cho YS; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1540-51. PubMed ID: 19064496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stroop dilution revisited: evidence for domain-specific, limited-capacity processing.
    Roberts MA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 15709859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cost of being watched: Stroop interference increases under concomitant eye contact.
    Conty L; Gimmig D; Belletier C; George N; Huguet P
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 20070959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A sensory origin for color-word stroop effects in aging: simulating age-related changes in color-vision mimics age-related changes in Stroop.
    Ben-David BM; Schneider BA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Nov; 17(6):730-46. PubMed ID: 21058053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multistream model of visual word recognition.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Kaut KP; Canfield A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 19304618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return.
    Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):935-44. PubMed ID: 19679871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: strength of Stroop-like interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials.
    Klapp ST
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1366-76. PubMed ID: 18085949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reverse stroop effects with untranslated responses.
    Blais C; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1345-53. PubMed ID: 17154776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?
    Brown TL; Gore CL; Carr TH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):220-40. PubMed ID: 12049241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional selection and word processing in Stroop and word search tasks: the role of selection for action.
    Brown TL
    Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 8644887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments.
    Larsen RJ; Mercer KA; Balota DA
    Emotion; 2006 Feb; 6(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 16637750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.