These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12589896)

  • 1. Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of working memory.
    Vos SH; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 16(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 12589896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
    Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing Italian relative clauses: working memory span and word order effects on RTs.
    Di Domenico A; Di Matteo R
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Oct; 136(4):387-406. PubMed ID: 19943612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach.
    Bornkessel ID; Fiebach CJ; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 15325409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
    Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.
    Fiebach CJ; Vos SH; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1562-75. PubMed ID: 15601519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How working memory capacity modulates the time course of semantic integration at sentence and discourse level.
    Yang X; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Li X
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Mar; 140():107383. PubMed ID: 32057933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events.
    Farmer TA; Fine AB; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):413-433. PubMed ID: 26652283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: a study with event-related potentials.
    Kolk HH; Chwilla DJ; van Herten M; Oor PJ
    Brain Lang; 2003 Apr; 85(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12681346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: a difficult case for activation theories.
    Gunter TC; Wagner S; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):643-57. PubMed ID: 12965038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children's verbal working memory: role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension.
    Magimairaj BM; Montgomery JW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):669-82. PubMed ID: 22223892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERPs reveal atypical processing of subject versus object Wh-questions in children with specific language impairment.
    Epstein B; Hestvik A; Shafer VL; Schwartz RG
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(4):351-65. PubMed ID: 23889832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in dyslexia: An examination of cognitive factors underlying eye movement differences and comprehension failures.
    Stella M; Engelhardt PE
    Dyslexia; 2019 May; 25(2):115-141. PubMed ID: 30990960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.
    Caplan D; Waters GS
    Behav Brain Sci; 1999 Feb; 22(1):77-94; discussion 95-126. PubMed ID: 11301522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement attraction during comprehension of grammatical sentences: ERP evidence from ellipsis.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Brain Lang; 2014 Aug; 135():42-51. PubMed ID: 24911918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of working memory and contextual constraints in children's processing of relative clauses.
    Weighall AR; Altmann GT
    J Child Lang; 2011 Jun; 38(3):579-605. PubMed ID: 21040621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influences of working memory updating on word association effects and thematic role assignment during sentence processing.
    Li T; Gao Y; Wu Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Jun; 184():108547. PubMed ID: 36967041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
    Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.