These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12590054)

  • 1. Performance of immunoassays in screening for opiates, cannabinoids and amphetamines in post-mortem blood.
    Hino Y; Ojanperä I; Rasanen I; Vuori E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Jan; 131(2-3):148-55. PubMed ID: 12590054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of immunochemical drug screenings of whole blood samples. A retrospective optimization of cutoff levels after confirmation-analysis on GC-MS and HPLC-DAD.
    Kroener L; Musshoff F; Madea B
    J Anal Toxicol; 2003; 27(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 12820742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for drugs in forensic blood samples using EMIT urine assays.
    Gjerde H; Christophersen AS; Skuterud B; Klemetsen K; Mørland J
    Forensic Sci Int; 1990 Feb; 44(2-3):179-85. PubMed ID: 2180797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of cloned enzyme donor immunoassay cut-offs for drugs of abuse in post-mortem whole blood.
    Pelletti G; Rossi F; Garagnani M; Barone R; Roffi R; Fais P; Pelotti S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jul; 312():110291. PubMed ID: 32353744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization and validation of CEDIA drugs of abuse immunoassay tests in serum on Hitachi 912.
    Kirschbaum KM; Musshoff F; Schmithausen R; Stockhausen S; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):252-5. PubMed ID: 21775079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of the MTP immunoassay with EMIT in blood screening for drugs].
    Käferstein H; Sticht G
    Arch Kriminol; 1998; 202(5-6):165-72. PubMed ID: 10023491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immunoassay and GC-MS procedures for the analysis of drugs of abuse in meconium.
    ElSohly MA; Stanford DF; Murphy TP; Lester BM; Wright LL; Smeriglio VL; Verter J; Bauer CR; Shankaran S; Bada HS; Walls HC
    J Anal Toxicol; 1999 Oct; 23(6):436-45. PubMed ID: 10517548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of DRI enzyme immunoassays for drugs-of-abuse screening on the Cobas Mira.
    Broussard LA; Hanson L
    Clin Lab Sci; 1997; 10(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 10166356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The determination of drugs of abuse in whole blood by means of FPIA and EMIT-dau immunoassays--a comparative study.
    Bogusz M; Aderjan R; Schmitt G; Nadler E; Neureither B
    Forensic Sci Int; 1990 Nov; 48(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 2279719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
    Lu NT; Taylor BG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):106-16. PubMed ID: 15899564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous screening and detection of drugs in small blood samples and bloodstains.
    Schütz H; Gotta JC; Erdmann F; Risse M; Weiler G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2002 May; 126(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 12062939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Abuscreen ONLINE assay for amphetamines on the Hitachi 737: comparison with EMIT and GC/MS methods.
    Baker DP; Murphy MS; Shepp PF; Royo VR; Caldarone ME; Escoto B; Salamone SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Jan; 40(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 7876791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel procedure for the analysis of drugs in whole blood by homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (EMIT).
    Lewellen LJ; McCurdy HH
    J Anal Toxicol; 1988; 12(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 2906382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the triage system for emergency drugs-of-abuse testing in urine.
    Wu AH; Wong SS; Johnson KG; Callies J; Shu DX; Dunn WE; Wong SH
    J Anal Toxicol; 1993; 17(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 8371556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of EMIT II, CEDIA, and DPC RIA assays for the detection of lysergic acid diethylamide in forensic urine samples.
    Wiegand RF; Klette KL; Stout PR; Gehlhausen JM
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):519-23. PubMed ID: 12423010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of six immunoassays for the detection of amphetamines in urine.
    Verstraete AG; Heyden FV
    J Anal Toxicol; 2005; 29(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 16105261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of several immunoassays used in drugs of abuse screening: Assessment against gold standard methods and calculation of measurement uncertainty.
    Mina A
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2020; 101():106649. PubMed ID: 31730939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of the Triage panel for drugs of abuse to forensic blood samples.
    Moriya F; Hashimoto Y
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Apr; 50(2):50-6. PubMed ID: 8691649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between drug screening by immunoassay and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry in post-mortem urine.
    Sundström M; Pelander A; Ojanperä I
    Drug Test Anal; 2015 May; 7(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 24953563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) for drugs-of-abuse screening.
    Armbruster DA; Hubster EC; Kaufman MS; Ramon MK
    Clin Chem; 1995 Jan; 41(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 7813088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.