These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12590067)
1. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation: ethical issues. Oughton D J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):3-18. PubMed ID: 12590067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An overview of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants. Larsson CM J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1364-70. PubMed ID: 18261830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ERICA Integrated Approach and its contribution to protection of the environment from ionising radiation. Howard BJ; Larsson CM J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1361-3. PubMed ID: 18539370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioethics and environment: a hermeneutic approach. Junges JR; Selli L J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):105-19, 198-9. PubMed ID: 18664004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward understanding aspects of the precautionary principle. Cranor CF J Med Philos; 2004 Jun; 29(3):259-79. PubMed ID: 15512972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics and radiation protection. Hansson SO J Radiol Prot; 2007 Jun; 27(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 17664660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How not to criticize the precautionary principle. Hughes J J Med Philos; 2006 Oct; 31(5):447-64. PubMed ID: 17079207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The optimisation approach of ALARA in nuclear practice: an early application of the precautionary principle. Scientific uncertainty versus legal uncertainty. Lierman S; Veuchelen L Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):81-6. PubMed ID: 16304938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Science, policy, and the protection of human health: a European perspective. Martuzzi M Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S151-6. PubMed ID: 16059917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two concepts of empirical ethics. Parker M Bioethics; 2009 May; 23(4):202-13. PubMed ID: 19338521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to connect bioethics and environmental ethics: health, sustainability, and justice. Dwyer J Bioethics; 2009 Nov; 23(9):497-502. PubMed ID: 19788647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four ways people approach ethics. A practical guide to reaching consensus on moral problems. O'Toole B Health Prog; 1998; 79(6):38-41, 43. PubMed ID: 10339231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ecosystem valuation: a sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Turner RK; Morse-Jones S; Fisher B Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2010 Jan; 1185():79-101. PubMed ID: 20146763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context (protect): proposed numerical benchmark values. Andersson P; Garnier-Laplace J; Beresford NA; Copplestone D; Howard BJ; Howe P; Oughton D; Whitehouse P J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1100-8. PubMed ID: 19589629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision-making in environmental radiation protection: using the ERICA Integrated Approach. Zinger I; Copplestone D; Howard BJ J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1510-8. PubMed ID: 18395308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation: developing criteria and evaluating approaches for use in regulation. Copplestone D; Beresford N; Howard B J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 20548137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Precaution, uncertainty and causation in environmental decisions. Ricci PF; Rice D; Ziagos J; Cox LA Environ Int; 2003 Apr; 29(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12605931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics, genetics and dynamics: an emerging systematic approach to radiation protection of the environment. Pentreath RJ J Environ Radioact; 2004; 74(1-3):19-30. PubMed ID: 15063533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical theory, "common morality," and professional obligations. Alexandra A; Miller S Theor Med Bioeth; 2009; 30(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19199076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Just who is at risk? The ethics of environmental regulation. Simon T Hum Exp Toxicol; 2011 Aug; 30(8):795-819. PubMed ID: 20670991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]