These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12590721)

  • 1. Bare bones laparoscopy: a randomized prospective trial of cost savings in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Brackman MR; Foley E; Esquivel J; Boisvert ME; Davis S; Daza E; Kirkpatrick JR; Finelli FC
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2002 Dec; 12(6):411-7. PubMed ID: 12590721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less expensive than open cholecystectomy.
    Anderson RE; Hunter JG
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1991 Jun; 1(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 1669387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Slater M; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):670-2. PubMed ID: 19785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.
    Gitelis M; Vigneswaran Y; Ujiki MB; Denham W; Talamonti M; Muldoon JP; Linn JG
    Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 25586597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.
    Ure BM; Lefering R; Holschneider AM
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1999 Feb; 9(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Costs and benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: abdominal wall lifting vs. pneumoperitoneum procedure.
    Ishikawa M; Nakagawa T; Nishioka M; Ogata S; Miyauchi T; Kashiwagi Y; Uemura N; Inoue S
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(70):497-500. PubMed ID: 16995448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.
    Johansson M; Thune A; Nelvin L; Stiernstam M; Westman B; Lundell L
    Br J Surg; 2005 Jan; 92(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 15584058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].
    Lefering R; Troidl H; Ure BM
    Chirurg; 1994 Apr; 65(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 8020351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomised study.
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt CN; Encke A
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):147-50. PubMed ID: 7552133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy in the management of unilateral nonpalpable testicles.
    Lorenzo AJ; Samuelson ML; Docimo SG; Baker LA; Lotan Y
    J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):712-6. PubMed ID: 15247768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospital costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study].
    Secco GB; Cataletti M; Bonfante P; Baldi E; Davini MD; Biasotti B; Ravera G; Ferraris R
    Chir Ital; 2002; 54(5):685-92. PubMed ID: 12469466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Traverso LW; Hargrave K
    Am J Surg; 1995 May; 169(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 7747829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed Via the "Marionette" Technique Shows Equivalence in Outcome and Cost to Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Selected Patient Population.
    Saidy MN; Patel SS; Choi MW; Al-Temimi M; Tessier DJ
    Am Surg; 2015 Oct; 81(10):1015-20. PubMed ID: 26463300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reusables may slow rising tide of laparoscopic surgery costs.
    Souhrada L
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Feb; 2(2):22. PubMed ID: 10171424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardization of operative equipment reduces cost.
    Avansino JR; Goldin AB; Risley R; Waldhausen JH; Sawin RS
    J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Sep; 48(9):1843-9. PubMed ID: 24074655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Demoulin L; Kesteloot K; Penninckx F
    Surg Endosc; 1996 May; 10(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 8658331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.
    Sanabria JR; Clavien PA; Cywes R; Strasberg SM
    Can J Surg; 1993 Aug; 36(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 8103704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low fresh gas flow balanced anesthesia versus target controlled intravenous infusion anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cost-minimization analysis.
    Stevanovic PD; Petrova G; Miljkovic B; Scepanovic R; Perunovic R; Stojanovic D; Dobrasinovic J
    Clin Ther; 2008 Sep; 30(9):1714-25. PubMed ID: 18840378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards.
    Allen JW; Polk HC
    Am Surg; 2002 May; 68(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 12013293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.