These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12591690)

  • 1. Peripheral blood eosinophilia associated with gastrointestinal administration of iodinated contrast media.
    Plavsic BM; Newman AC; Reuther WL; Terry JA; Drnovsek VH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Mar; 180(3):751-3. PubMed ID: 12591690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toxic epidermal necrolysis related to oral administration of diluted diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium.
    Schmidt BJ; Foley WD; Bohorfoush AG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1215-6. PubMed ID: 9798850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anaphylactoid reaction after oral administration of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium solution.
    Miller SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):959-61. PubMed ID: 9124149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pretreatment of patients requiring oral contrast abdominal computed tomography with antiemetics: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy.
    Garra G; Singer AJ; Bamber D; Chohan J; Troxell R; Thode HC
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 53(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 18640743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Relationship between oral food intake and nausea caused by intravenous injection of iodinated contrast material].
    Oowaki K; Saigusa H; Ojiri H; Ariizumi M; Yamagisi J; Fukuda K; Tada S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May; 54(6):476-9. PubMed ID: 8028954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benign transient eosinophilia following intravenous urography.
    Vincent ME; Gerzof SG; Robbins AH
    JAMA; 1977 Jun; 237(24):2629. PubMed ID: 576988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Inter-individual testing of water-soluble oral contrast media with reference to their diagnostic value, side effects and taste].
    Stäbler A; Fink U; Siuda S; Neville S
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 2502828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is administration of enteric contrast material safe before abdominal CT in children who require sedation? Experience with chloral hydrate and pentobarbital.
    Ziegler MA; Fricke BL; Donnelly LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan; 180(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 12490468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abdominal trauma: use of oral contrast material for CT is safe.
    Federle MP; Yagan N; Peitzman AB; Krugh J
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 9314968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
    Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anaphylactoid reaction to oral contrast for computed tomography.
    Seymour CW; Pryor JP; Gupta R; Schwab CW
    J Trauma; 2004 Nov; 57(5):1105-7. PubMed ID: 15580040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy.
    Chang KJ; Rekhi SS; Anderson SW; Soto JA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21160430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of colonic transit between polyethylene glycol and water as oral contrast vehicles in the CT evaluation of acute appendicitis.
    Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1188-91. PubMed ID: 17056904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iodide mumps after intravenous and oral administration of contrast medium.
    Linn JF; Fichtner J; Düber C; Hohenfellner R
    J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1774. PubMed ID: 8863604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Allergic reactions to oral iodinated contrast agents: reactions to oral contrast.
    Ridley LJ
    Australas Radiol; 1998 May; 42(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 9599824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anaphylactoid reaction to oral contrast agent.
    Marik PE; Patel SY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1623-4. PubMed ID: 9168750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acute thrombocytopenia after i.v. administration of a radiographic contrast medium.
    Chang JC; Lee D; Gross HM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):947-9. PubMed ID: 2705351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of intravenous contrast agents for CT studies in children.
    Cohen MD; Herman E; Herron D; White SJ; Smith JA
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):592-5. PubMed ID: 1449887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.