These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12592962)
1. Artificial intervertebral disk. Gepstein R; David R Isr Med Assoc J; 2003 Jan; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 12592962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of lumbar disk prosthesis after a follow-up period of 48 months. Caspi I; Levinkopf M; Nerubay J Isr Med Assoc J; 2003 Jan; 5(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 12592949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New artificial spinal disc has a learning curve, payment issues. Mathias JM OR Manager; 2005 Jan; 21(1):1, 16-8. PubMed ID: 15707141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The CHARITE Artificial Disc: design history, FDA IDE study results, and surgical technique. Geisler FH Clin Neurosurg; 2006; 53():223-8. PubMed ID: 17380756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The relation of artificial intervertebral disc replacement and spondylodesis]. Wang P Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 15808066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The artificial intervertebral disk. Guinn NJ Todays OR Nurse; 1994; 16(4):14-6. PubMed ID: 8066586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New disc bests fusion. Duke Med Health News; 2007 Jan; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 17299891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Artificial disc replacement promises the end of spinal fusion technology]. Tian W Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):9. PubMed ID: 15808065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Re: Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak J, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 2007;32:1155-62. Fairbank J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2929-30; author reply 2930-1. PubMed ID: 18246024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery. Huang RC; Girardi FP; Lim MR; Cammisa FP Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 15950686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spine-tingling prospects. Artificial disc implants are among the new technologies expected to revolutionize the outcomes of back surgery. Becker C Mod Healthc; 2003 Nov; 33(45):30-2. PubMed ID: 14666550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial. Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ProDisc artificial disc: insertion technique. Aryan HE; Acosta FL; Ames CP Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):651-6, vii. PubMed ID: 16326288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical disc arthroplasty: general introduction. Acosta FL; Ames CP Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):603-7, vi. PubMed ID: 16326283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature. Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Fusion or replacement: reevaluation of the bone grafting and fusion of the cervical vertebrae]. Yuan W Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 15808067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]