These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12592962)
21. [Theoretical basis for the optimal positioning of an intervertebral support after diskectomy]. Khvisiuk NI; Makovoz EM; Tugaev AS; Chikhladze ED Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1981 May; (5):1-5. PubMed ID: 7267046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Hilibrand AS; Robbins M Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):190S-194S. PubMed ID: 15541666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of cervical disk implants and cervical disk fusion treatments in human cadaveric models. Davies MA; Bryant SC; Larsen SP; Murrey DB; Nussman DS; Laxer EB; Darden BV J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 16813439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Re: Sasso R, Heller J, Hacker B, Smucker J. Artificial disc versus fusion. A prospective, randomized study with 2-years follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 2007;32:2933-40. Botelho RV Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):1156-7; author reply 1157. PubMed ID: 18449052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years. Kumar A; Beastall J; Hughes J; Karadimas EJ; Nicol M; Smith F; Wardlaw D Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):2909-14. PubMed ID: 19092623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Dorsal spondylodesis using punched metal plates]. Riess J Wien Med Wochenschr; 1976 Jul; 126(28-31):441-3. PubMed ID: 997562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study. Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. Lehman RA; Lenke LG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):E240-5. PubMed ID: 17414900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The current status of lumbar total disc replacement. Huang RC; Sandhu HS Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Jan; 35(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 15062716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]