102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12593006)
1. Computer prediction of hard tissue profiles in orthognathic surgery.
Loh S; Yow M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 12593006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery.
Loh S; Heng JK; Ward-Booth P; Winchester L; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 30(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 11518345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy of video imaging prediction in soft tissue outcome after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
Lu CH; Ko EW; Huang CS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 12618973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.
Aharon PA; Eisig S; Cisneros GJ
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 9456619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dolphin Imaging Software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction.
Power G; Breckon J; Sherriff M; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 15916879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the linearity of soft- to hard-tissue movement after orthognathic surgery.
Chew MT; Sandham A; Wong HB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 18984399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of a computer-based orthognathic surgery prediction system to postsurgical results.
Gerbo LR; Poulton DR; Covell DA; Russell CA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 9456618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facial soft tissue esthetic predictions: validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery with cone beam computed tomography data.
Bianchi A; Muyldermans L; Di Martino M; Lancellotti L; Amadori S; Sarti A; Marchetti C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20561464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction accuracy of computer-assisted surgical visual treatment objectives as compared with conventional visual treatment objectives.
Gossett CB; Preston CB; Dunford R; Lampasso J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):609-17. PubMed ID: 15883933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction accuracy of soft tissue profile in orthognathic surgery.
Mankad B; Cisneros GJ; Freeman K; Eisig SB
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10337247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
Naoumova J; Lindman R
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional computer-assisted simulation combining facial skeleton with facial morphology for orthognathic surgery.
Chen LH; Chen WH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 10686837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The optical surface scan as an alternative to the cephalograph for soft tissue analysis for orthognathic surgery.
Soncul M; Bamber MA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 10895642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new method for locating anterior skeletal landmarks from soft tissue measurements.
Ligthelm-Bakker AS; Prahl-Andersen B; Wattel E; Uljee IH
J Biol Buccale; 1991 Dec; 19(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 1791165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients.
Demir A; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of video imaging in mandibular surgery.
Carter AC; Larson BE; Guenthner TA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 9456606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
