These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12593305)
21. Quantitative vs qualitative research. Brink H Nurs RSA; 1991 Jan; 6(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 2011171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. What future for research in mental health nursing: share the objective statistics! Parsons S J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 9807359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Why are reliability and validity important to neuroscience nurses? Buelow JM; Hinkle JL J Neurosci Nurs; 2008 Dec; 40(6):369-70, 372. PubMed ID: 19170305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative and qualitative research methods: advantages of complementary usage. Lederman RP MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1991; 16(1):43. PubMed ID: 1900905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability and validity in practice: assessment tools. Alison T; Shields L Paediatr Nurs; 2005 Nov; 17(9):43. PubMed ID: 16315818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Case study: design? Method? Or comprehensive strategy? Jones C; Lyons C Nurse Res; 2004; 11(3):70-6. PubMed ID: 15065485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Understanding and critiquing quantitative research papers. Lee P Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 11-17; 102(28):28-30. PubMed ID: 16869219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What future for research in mental health nursing: rejoinder to Parsons, Beech and Rolfe. Gournay K; Ritter S J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 9807357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The discussion section of a research report. Connelly LM Medsurg Nurs; 2009; 18(5):300-1. PubMed ID: 19927967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of unreliability of measurements on statistical conclusion validity. Strickland OL J Nurs Meas; 2005; 13(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 16401039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Conceptual and pragmatic considerations in conducting a secondary analysis. An example from research of families. Shepard MP; Carroll RM; Mahon MM; Moriarty HJ; Feetham SL; Deatrick JA; Orsi AJ West J Nurs Res; 1999 Apr; 21(2):154-67. PubMed ID: 11512174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The marriage of heaven and hell: further remarks on the future for mental health research. Rolfe G J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 1998 Jun; 5(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 9807358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of action research. Karim K Nurs Stand; 2001 Mar 14-20; 15(26):33-5. PubMed ID: 12216236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How to appraise quantitative research. Cathala X; Moorley C Evid Based Nurs; 2018 Oct; 21(4):99-101. PubMed ID: 30228107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A guide to evaluating hypotheses and definitions of variables. Haughey BP Crit Care Nurse; 1992 Dec; 12(8):98-103. PubMed ID: 1288958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]