These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12593324)

  • 1. On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Plumm KM; Smith JR; Roberts WA
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Nov; 30(4):315-29. PubMed ID: 12593324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating retrospective influences on induction in rats' responding for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 16475670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of place of reinforcer delivery in the appearance of positive induction when rats respond for 1% sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Kristiansen-Moen LA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 16782285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
    Weatherly JN; Grove C; Beste R
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Altering "motivational" variables alters induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Tischart LM
    Anim Cogn; 2003 Mar; 6(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 12658532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three tests of 'anticipatory responding' as an account for induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Himle MB; Plumm KM; Moulton PL
    Behav Processes; 2001 Oct; 56(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 11566237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction when rats lick for 1% liquid-sucrose reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Lang KK; King BM; Beste R; Grove C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):654-66. PubMed ID: 16707355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of second-half reinforcer type on responding for sucrose in the first half of the session.
    Weatherly JN; Stout JE; Rue HC; Melville CL
    Behav Processes; 2000 Mar; 49(1):43-60. PubMed ID: 10725652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus control over induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Tischart LM; Palbicki J
    Behav Processes; 2003 Aug; 64(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 12915001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Upcoming food-pellet reinforcement alters rats' lever pressing for liquid sucrose delivered by a progressive-ratio schedule.
    Weatherly JN; King BM; Uran EL
    Behav Processes; 2003 Jun; 63(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 12763270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of response-contingent incentives in lithium chloride-mediated suppression of an operant response.
    Meachum CL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 2164238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Duration, response, and location: the influence of upcoming 32% sucrose on rats' licking or lever pressing for 1% liquid sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Arthur EI; King BM
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 15939550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Butorphanol increases food-reinforced operant responding in satiated rats.
    Rudski JM; Billington CJ; Levine AS
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Dec; 49(4):843-7. PubMed ID: 7886096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sucrose, ethanol, and sucrose/ethanol reinforced responding under variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Files FJ; Samson HH; Brice GT
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1995 Oct; 19(5):1271-8. PubMed ID: 8561301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Naloxone's effects on operant responding depend upon level of deprivation.
    Rudski JM; Billington CJ; Levine AS
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Oct; 49(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 7824553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chronic morphine treatment exaggerates the suppressive effects of sucrose and cocaine, but not lithium chloride, on saccharin intake in Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Grigson PS; Wheeler RA; Wheeler DS; Ballard SM
    Behav Neurosci; 2001 Apr; 115(2):403-16. PubMed ID: 11345965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of body weight manipulation.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15222966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.