118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12593324)
1. On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
Weatherly JN; Plumm KM; Smith JR; Roberts WA
Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Nov; 30(4):315-29. PubMed ID: 12593324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating retrospective influences on induction in rats' responding for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
Weatherly JN; Arthur EI
J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 16475670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of place of reinforcer delivery in the appearance of positive induction when rats respond for 1% sucrose.
Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Kristiansen-Moen LA
Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 16782285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
Weatherly JN; Grove C; Beste R
J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Altering "motivational" variables alters induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Tischart LM
Anim Cogn; 2003 Mar; 6(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 12658532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three tests of 'anticipatory responding' as an account for induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
Weatherly JN; Himle MB; Plumm KM; Moulton PL
Behav Processes; 2001 Oct; 56(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 11566237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction when rats lick for 1% liquid-sucrose reinforcement.
Weatherly JN; Lang KK; King BM; Beste R; Grove C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):654-66. PubMed ID: 16707355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of second-half reinforcer type on responding for sucrose in the first half of the session.
Weatherly JN; Stout JE; Rue HC; Melville CL
Behav Processes; 2000 Mar; 49(1):43-60. PubMed ID: 10725652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus control over induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
Weatherly JN; Tischart LM; Palbicki J
Behav Processes; 2003 Aug; 64(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 12915001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Upcoming food-pellet reinforcement alters rats' lever pressing for liquid sucrose delivered by a progressive-ratio schedule.
Weatherly JN; King BM; Uran EL
Behav Processes; 2003 Jun; 63(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 12763270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of response-contingent incentives in lithium chloride-mediated suppression of an operant response.
Meachum CL
Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 2164238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Duration, response, and location: the influence of upcoming 32% sucrose on rats' licking or lever pressing for 1% liquid sucrose.
Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Arthur EI; King BM
Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 15939550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Butorphanol increases food-reinforced operant responding in satiated rats.
Rudski JM; Billington CJ; Levine AS
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Dec; 49(4):843-7. PubMed ID: 7886096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sucrose, ethanol, and sucrose/ethanol reinforced responding under variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
Files FJ; Samson HH; Brice GT
Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1995 Oct; 19(5):1271-8. PubMed ID: 8561301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Naloxone's effects on operant responding depend upon level of deprivation.
Rudski JM; Billington CJ; Levine AS
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Oct; 49(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 7824553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chronic morphine treatment exaggerates the suppressive effects of sucrose and cocaine, but not lithium chloride, on saccharin intake in Sprague-Dawley rats.
Grigson PS; Wheeler RA; Wheeler DS; Ballard SM
Behav Neurosci; 2001 Apr; 115(2):403-16. PubMed ID: 11345965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of body weight manipulation.
Belke TW
Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15222966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
