These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12593431)

  • 1. Analyses of absorbed dose to tooth enamel against external photon exposure.
    Takahashi F; Yamaguchi Y; Iwasaki M; Miyazawa C; Hamada T; Funabiki J; Saito K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 103(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 12593431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo calculation and experimental verification of the photon energy response of tooth enamel in a head-sized plexiglas phantom.
    Wieser A; Aragno D; El-Faramawy N; Fattibene P; Meckbach R; Onori S; Pressello MC; Pugliani L; Ulanovsky A; Zankl M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):549-52. PubMed ID: 12382809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relations between tooth enamel dose and organ doses for electron spin resonance dosimetry against external photon exposure.
    Takahashi F; Yamaguchi Y; Iwasaki M; Miyazawa C; Hamada T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 11572637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ESR and TL dosimetry systems: comparative measurements for human phantom.
    Stepanenko VF; Skvortsov VG; Ivannikov AI; Kondrashov AE; Vaichulis PP; Denisenko ON; Kozlov VA; Khamidova LG; Tikunov DD; Panfilov AP; Eichhozff U
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1996; 47(11-12):1359-63. PubMed ID: 9022197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of EPR signal dose response of tooth enamel to photons: experiment and Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ivannikov AI; Tikunov DD; Borysheva NB; Trompier F; Skvortsov VG; Stepanenko VF; Hoshi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 15103060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ENERGY RESPONSE FACTOR of BeO DOSEMETER CHIPS: A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND GENERAL CAVITY THEORY STUDY.
    Sarigul N; Surucu M; Aydogan B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(3):303-309. PubMed ID: 30806472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External exposure of deciduous tooth enamel to photons: dose conversion coefficients for standard radiation fields.
    Ulanovsky A; Wieser A
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2007 Nov; 46(4):339-48. PubMed ID: 17690896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
    Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
    Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculated energy response correction factors for LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters employed in the seventh EULEP dosimetry intercomparison.
    Zoetelief J; Jansen JT
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Aug; 42(8):1491-504. PubMed ID: 9279901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
    Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Organ dose conversions from ESR measurements using tooth enamel of atomic bomb survivors.
    Takahashi F; Sato K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Mar; 149(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 22128360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of phantom materials on the energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters exposed to 20-300 kV narrow x-ray spectra, 137Cs and 60Co photons.
    Massillon-J L G; Cabrera-Santiago A; Minniti R; O'Brien M; Soares CG
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4149-66. PubMed ID: 25004055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric response of tooth enamel to 14 Mev neutrons.
    Fattibene P; Angelone M; De Coste V; Pillon M
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2004 Jul; 43(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15118864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by LiF TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam.
    Budanec M; Knezević Z; Bokulić T; Mrcela I; Vrtar M; Vekić B; Kusić Z
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 18541436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of improved TLD dosimetry on the determination of dose rate constants for (125)I and (103)Pd brachytherapy seeds.
    Rodriguez M; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):114301. PubMed ID: 25370677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose measurements in inhomogeneous bone/tissue and lung/tissue phantoms for angiography using synchrotron radiation.
    Nariyama N; Namito Y; Ban S; Hirayama H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Mar; 46(3):717-28. PubMed ID: 11277220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A close correlation between electron spin resonance (ESR) dosimetry from tooth enamel and cytogenetic dosimetry from lymphocytes of Hiroshima atomic-bomb survivors.
    Nakamura N; Miyazawa C; Sawada S; Akiyama M; Awa AA
    Int J Radiat Biol; 1998 Jun; 73(6):619-27. PubMed ID: 9690680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thin layer alpha-Al2O3:C beta dosemeters for the assessment of current dose rate in teeth due to 90Sr intake, and comparison with electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry.
    Göksu HY; Semiochkina N; Shiskina EA; Wieser A; El-Faramawy NA; Degteva MO; Jacob P; Ivanov DV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):507-13. PubMed ID: 12382802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.