These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12593750)

  • 1. When expertise backfires: contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion.
    Bohner G; Ruder M; Erb HP
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 41(Pt 4):495-519. PubMed ID: 12593750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assimilation and contrast in persuasion: the effects of source credibility in multiple message situations.
    Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Apr; 33(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 17363764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the message or the messenger? Implications for self-validation in persuasion.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT; Sawicki V; Petty RE; Briñol P
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1571-84. PubMed ID: 23969619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review.
    Kumkale GT; Albarracín D
    Psychol Bull; 2004 Jan; 130(1):143-72. PubMed ID: 14717653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effects of attitude formation, persuasive message, and source expertise on attitude change: an examination based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model and the Attitude Formation Theory].
    Nakamura M; Saito K; Wakabayashi M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1990 Apr; 61(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2250413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relevance override: on the reduced impact of "cues" under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies.
    Pierro A; Mannetti L; Kruglanski AW; Sleeth-Keppler D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 14769082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment.
    Chaiken S; Maheswaran D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 Mar; 66(3):460-73. PubMed ID: 8169760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotion and persuasion: cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes.
    Petty RE; Briñol P
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 25302943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis.
    Petty RE; Briñol P; Tormala ZL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 May; 82(5):722-41. PubMed ID: 12003473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mood and multiple source characteristics: mood congruency of source consensus status and source trustworthiness as determinants of message scrutiny.
    Ziegler R; Diehl M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1016-30. PubMed ID: 21632961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making message recipients "feel right": how nonverbal cues can increase persuasion.
    Cesario J; Higgins ET
    Psychol Sci; 2008 May; 19(5):415-20. PubMed ID: 18466399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM; Garcia-Marques T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 19210062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive and affective matching effects in persuasion: an amplification perspective.
    Clarkson JJ; Tormala ZL; Rucker DD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1415-27. PubMed ID: 21734162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resisting persuasion by the skin of one's teeth: the hidden success of resisted persuasive messages.
    Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(3):423-35. PubMed ID: 16938028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Valle C; Rucker DD; Becerra A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Dec; 93(6):1040-53. PubMed ID: 18072853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: need for cognition determines the impact of message format.
    Bakker AB
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1999 Apr; 11(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 10214498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion.
    Axsom D; Yates S; Chaiken S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1987 Jul; 53(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 3612491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19106081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies.
    DeSteno D; Petty RE; Rucker DD; Wegener DT; Braverman J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jan; 86(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 14717627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.