These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12593752)

  • 1. Justice and the regulation of social relations: when and why do group members deny claims to social goods?
    Huo YJ
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 41(Pt 4):535-62. PubMed ID: 12593752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive bias in procedural justice: formation and implications of illusory correlations in perceived intergroup fairness.
    Stroessner SJ; Heuer LB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Oct; 71(4):717-28. PubMed ID: 8888600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medium of exchange matters: what's fair for goods is unfair for money.
    DeVoe SE; Iyengar SS
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 20424037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior.
    Tyler TR; Blader SL
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2003; 7(4):349-61. PubMed ID: 14633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A social categorization approach to distributive justice: social identity as the link between relevance of inputs and need for justice.
    Wenzel M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2001 Sep; 40(Pt 3):315-35. PubMed ID: 11593937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Justice judgements, school failure, and adolescent deviant behaviour.
    Sanches C; Gouveia-Pereira M; Carugati F
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2012 Dec; 82(Pt 4):606-21. PubMed ID: 23025395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior.
    Blader SL; Tyler TR
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):445-64. PubMed ID: 19271800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individualistic and social motives for justice judgments.
    van Prooijen JW
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 Sep; 1299():60-7. PubMed ID: 25708080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms.
    Killen M; Rutland A; Abrams D; Mulvey KL; Hitti A
    Child Dev; 2013; 84(3):1063-80. PubMed ID: 23163757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.
    Parks CD; Joireman J; Van Lange PA
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2013 Dec; 14(3):119-65. PubMed ID: 26171620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A four-component model of procedural justice: defining the meaning of a "fair" process.
    Blader SL; Tyler TR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Jun; 29(6):747-58. PubMed ID: 15189630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When the association between appearance and outcome contaminates social judgment: a bidirectional model linking group homogeneity and collective treatment.
    Alter AL; Darley JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):776-95. PubMed ID: 19857001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social groups and children's intergroup attitudes: can school norms moderate the effects of social group norms?
    Nesdale D; Lawson MJ
    Child Dev; 2011; 82(5):1594-606. PubMed ID: 21883158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two experimental tests of relational models of procedural justice: non-instrumental voice and authority group membership.
    Platow MJ; Eggins RA; Chattopadhyay R; Brewer G; Hardwick L; Milsom L; Brocklebank J; Lalor T; Martin R; Quee M; Vassallo S; Welsh J
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):361-76. PubMed ID: 22251431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceiving expatriate coworkers as foreigners encourages aid: social categorization and procedural justice together improve intergroup cooperation and dual identity.
    Leonardelli GJ; Toh SM
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 22(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 21148458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When do fair procedures not matter? A test of the identity violation effect.
    Mayer DM; Greenbaum RL; Kuenzi M; Shteynberg G
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):142-61. PubMed ID: 19186901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Justice Without Borders: The Influence of Psychological Distance and Construal Level on Moral Exclusion.
    Mentovich A; Yudkin D; Tyler T; Trope Y
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1349-63. PubMed ID: 27581818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fairness and health care decision making: testing the group value model of procedural justice.
    Murphy-Berman V; Cross T; Fondacaro M
    Soc Justice Res; 1999 Jun; 12(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 12564443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diverse According to Whom? Racial group membership and concerns about discrimination shape diversity judgments.
    Bauman CW; Trawalter S; Unzueta MM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1354-72. PubMed ID: 25106545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.