These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12593752)

  • 21. Are perceptions of fairness relationship-specific? The case of noblesse oblige.
    Fiddick L; Cummins D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jan; 60(1):16-31. PubMed ID: 17162505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Social class rank, essentialism, and punitive judgment.
    Kraus MW; Keltner D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Aug; 105(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 23713698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?
    Mullen E; Skitka LJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 16649859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams.
    Colquitt JA
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Aug; 89(4):633-46. PubMed ID: 15327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Justice orientation as a moderator of the framing effect on procedural justice perception.
    Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
    J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 24873027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
    Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What's fair is fair--or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice.
    Rasinski KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1987 Jul; 53(1):201-11. PubMed ID: 3612490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation.
    Ambrose ML; Schminke M
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):491-500. PubMed ID: 19271803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Beyond procedure's content: the role of accessibility experiences and personal uncertainty in procedural justice judgements.
    Greifeneder R; Müller P; Stahlberg D; Van den Bos K; Bless H
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(5):341-52. PubMed ID: 21310689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Innovation credit: when can leaders oppose their group's norms?
    Abrams D; de Moura GR; Marques JM; Hutchison P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):662-78. PubMed ID: 18729701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity.
    Postmes T; Spears R; Lee AT; Novak RJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Nov; 89(5):747-63. PubMed ID: 16351366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Seeking conversion versus advocating tolerance in the pursuit of social change.
    Prislin R; Filson J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):811-22. PubMed ID: 19857003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "But the poor needed it more": Children's judgments on procedural justice to allocate resources between two candidates equal in merit, different in need.
    Acar M; Sivis O
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Aug; 232():105679. PubMed ID: 37060788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of temporal distance on justice and care morality.
    Agerström J; Björklund F; Allwood CM
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 19392946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Procedural justice and quality of life in compensation processes.
    Elbers NA; Akkermans AJ; Cuijpers P; Bruinvels DJ
    Injury; 2013 Nov; 44(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 22975157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reactions to others' mistakes: an empirical test of fairness theory.
    Williams KJ; Nicklin JM
    J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 143(5):533-58. PubMed ID: 19943403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The interaction of criminal procedure and outcome.
    Laxminarayan M; Pemberton A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):564-71. PubMed ID: 24656217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The relational factor in civil action procedure: appreciation of the judge as sympathetic supporter].
    Imazai K; Imazai K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2006 Apr; 77(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 16862963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Struggles for value: value practices, injustice, judgment, affect and the idea of class.
    Skeggs B; Loveday V
    Br J Sociol; 2012 Sep; 63(3):472-90. PubMed ID: 22950464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Procedural justice and the hedonic principle: how approach versus avoidance motivation influences the psychology of voice.
    van Prooijen JW; Karremans JC; van Beest I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Oct; 91(4):686-97. PubMed ID: 17014293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.