242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12593888)
1. Electronic searching of the literature for systematic reviews of screening and diagnostic tests for preterm birth.
Honest H; Bachmann LM; Khan K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Mar; 107(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12593888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of absence of fetal breathing movements in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review.
Honest H; Bachmann LM; Sengupta R; Gupta JK; Kleijnen J; Khan KS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 24(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 15229924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protocol: a systematic review of studies developing and/or evaluating search strategies to identify prognosis studies.
Corp N; Jordan JL; Hayden JA; Irvin E; Parker R; Smith A; van der Windt DA
Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):88. PubMed ID: 28427475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):200. PubMed ID: 30458825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.
Whiting P; Westwood M; Burke M; Sterne J; Glanville J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 18313560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English.
Major MP; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Sep; 137(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 16946429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.
Wright K; Golder S; Rodriguez-Lopez R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():73. PubMed ID: 24893958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking.
Preston L; Carroll C; Gardois P; Paisley S; Kaltenthaler E
Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():82. PubMed ID: 26113080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review.
Honest H; Bachmann LM; Gupta JK; Kleijnen J; Khan KS
BMJ; 2002 Aug; 325(7359):301. PubMed ID: 12169504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian.
Li L; Tian J; Tian H; Moher D; Liang F; Jiang T; Yao L; Yang K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1001-7. PubMed ID: 24841794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
Hanneke R; Young SK
Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are men difficult to find? Identifying male-specific studies in MEDLINE and Embase.
Stewart F; Fraser C; Robertson C; Avenell A; Archibald D; Douglas F; Hoddinott P; van Teijlingen E; Boyers D
Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; 3():78. PubMed ID: 25033713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews.
Rathbone J; Albarqouni L; Bakhit M; Beller E; Byambasuren O; Hoffmann T; Scott AM; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):233. PubMed ID: 29178925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality.
Betrán AP; Say L; Gülmezoglu AM; Allen T; Hampson L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jan; 5(1):6. PubMed ID: 15679886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lessons for search strategies from a systematic review, in The Cochrane Library, of nutritional supplementation trials in patients after hip fracture.
Avenell A; Handoll HH; Grant AM
Am J Clin Nutr; 2001 Mar; 73(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 11237924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]