These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12594469)

  • 1. Ministers back gene-crop advisers.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):775. PubMed ID: 12594469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Terminator no solution to gene flow.
    Shand H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):775-6. PubMed ID: 12147996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Directive action required.
    Nature; 2007 Dec; 450(7172):921. PubMed ID: 18075528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chinese agribiotech: Against the grain.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):111-2. PubMed ID: 12634752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
    Smyth S; McHughen A
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GM crops: a continent divided.
    Masood E
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):224-6. PubMed ID: 14628018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flawed science underlies laws on transgenic crops.
    Sandermann H
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):613. PubMed ID: 12904760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Courts upbraid USDA for 'lax review' of GM crops.
    Waltz E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):970. PubMed ID: 19898439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices.
    Hails RS
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):685-8. PubMed ID: 12167875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. European disarray on transgenic crops.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7232):946. PubMed ID: 19238685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns.
    König A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field trials excluded from UK crop appraisal.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2002 Dec; 420(6915):453. PubMed ID: 12466806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biotech crops' seal of safety does not convince skeptics.
    Keogh B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Apr; 104(7):498-501. PubMed ID: 22440678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concern about Japan's unclear biotech regulations.
    Watanabe KN
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transgenic harvest.
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7316):633-4. PubMed ID: 20930796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Showdown for Europe.
    Abbott A; Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2007 Dec; 450(7172):928-9. PubMed ID: 18075535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nutrient biofortification of food crops.
    Hirschi KD
    Annu Rev Nutr; 2009; 29():401-21. PubMed ID: 19400753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Codex task force agrees on final draft of principles for the evaluation of GM foods.
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Sep; 39(5):408. PubMed ID: 12229859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crop improvement: A dying breed.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6923):568-70. PubMed ID: 12571562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.