142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12594546)
1. Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results.
Bielen D; Thomeer M; Vanbeckevoort D; Kiss G; Maes F; Marchal G; Rutgeerts P
Eur Radiol; 2003 Mar; 13(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 12594546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fecal tag CT colonography with a limited 2-day bowel preparation following incomplete colonoscopy.
Meric K; Bakal N; Aydin S; Yesil A; Tekesin K; Simsek M
Jpn J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 25895857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.
Pollentine A; Mortimer A; McCoubrie P; Archer L
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):1085-92. PubMed ID: 22422379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy.
Chang KJ; Rekhi SS; Anderson SW; Soto JA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21160430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bowel preparation suitable for same-day computed tomography colonography and colonoscopy.
Eddy M; Stevenson G; Mathieson J; Behrens C; Eddy R
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2011 Nov; 62(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 20619596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent.
Nagata K; Singh AK; Sangwaiya MJ; Näppi J; Zalis ME; Cai W; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 19596591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.
Lefere P; Gryspeerdt S; Marrannes J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 15908539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel volume-reduced CT colonography regimen using hypertonic laxative (polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid): randomized controlled trial.
Utano K; Takayanagi D; Nagata K; Aizawa M; Endo S; Nemoto T; Nemoto D; Isohata N; Lefor AK; Togashi K
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5236-5246. PubMed ID: 30903329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.
Lefere PA; Gryspeerdt SS; Dewyspelaere J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck BG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 12147834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomographic colonography with a reduced dose of laxative using a novel barium sulfate contrast agent in Japan.
Mitsuzaki K; Iinuma G; Morimoto T; Miyake M; Tomimatsu H
Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):245-254. PubMed ID: 30554302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR colonography with fecal tagging: comparison between 2D turbo FLASH and 3D FLASH sequences.
Papanikolaou N; Grammatikakis J; Maris T; Lauenstein T; Prassopoulos P; Gourtsoyiannis N
Eur Radiol; 2003 Mar; 13(3):448-52. PubMed ID: 12594545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.
Dachman AH; Dawson DO; Lefere P; Yoshida H; Khan NU; Cipriani N; Rubin DT
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 16969601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil.
Achiam MP; Chabanova E; Løgager VB; Andersen LP; Thomsen HS; Rosenberg J
Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 18423314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Burling DN; Tam E; Greenhalgh R; Gartner L; Scarth J; Pearce R; Bassett P; Halligan S
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17404739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?
Thomeer M; Bielen D; Vanbeckevoort D; Dymarkowski S; Gevers A; Rutgeerts P; Hiele M; Van Cutsem E; Marchal G
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1410-5. PubMed ID: 12042947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography: patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen versus traditional cathartic cleansing.
Buccicardi D; Grosso M; Caviglia I; Gastaldo A; Carbone S; Neri E; Bartolozzi C; Quadri P
Abdom Imaging; 2011 Oct; 36(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 20959977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonlaxative PET/CT colonography: feasibility, acceptability, and pilot performance in patients at higher risk of colonic neoplasia.
Taylor SA; Bomanji JB; Manpanzure L; Robinson C; Groves AM; Dickson J; Papathanasiou ND; Greenhalgh R; Ell PJ; Halligan S
J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):854-61. PubMed ID: 20484420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
