These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12594708)

  • 1. Fluoroscopic image quality in the film and filmless eras: a standardized comparison performed in coronary interventional facilities.
    Laskey W; Wondrow M; Chambers C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Mar; 58(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 12594708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability in fluoroscopic X-ray exposure in contemporary cardiac catheterization laboratories.
    Laskey WK; Wondrow M; Holmes DR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Oct; 48(7):1361-4. PubMed ID: 17010795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does digital flat detector technology tip the scale towards better image quality or reduced patient dose in interventional cardiology?
    Bogaert E; Bacher K; Lapere R; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 18789622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation exposure during elective coronary angioplasty: the effect of flat-panel detection.
    Prasan AM; Ison G; Rees DM
    Heart Lung Circ; 2008 Jun; 17(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 18242132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical aspects of image quality and doses in gated pulsed imaging].
    Vetter S; Heckmann H; Strecker EP; Busch HP; Kamm KF; Allmendinger H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jul; 8(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 9759466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital radiography].
    Schnakenberg B
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(4):317-38. PubMed ID: 2236539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A digital fluoroscopic imaging system for verification during external beam radiotherapy].
    Takai M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 2247353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Logarithmic amplifier for computed tomography tasks using fluoroscopic projections.
    Buliev I; Badea C; Pallikarakis N
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(6):247-52. PubMed ID: 12490030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose reduction fluoroscopy in pediatrics.
    Lederman HM; Khademian ZP; Felice M; Hurh PJ
    Pediatr Radiol; 2002 Dec; 32(12):844-8. PubMed ID: 12447587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology.
    Vano E; Ubeda C; Leyton F; Miranda P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4049-62. PubMed ID: 18612174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High spatial-resolution CE-MRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 Tesla.
    Nael K; Ruehm SG; Michaely HJ; Pope W; Laub G; Finn JP; Villablanca JP
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Apr; 41(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 16523022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs).
    McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.