BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12594991)

  • 1. A femoral neck fracture model in rabbits.
    Ohnishi I; Oikawa K; Tsuji K; Ichikawa T; Kurokawa T
    J Biomech; 2003 Mar; 36(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 12594991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DXA and pQCT predict pertrochanteric and not femoral neck fracture load in a human side-impact fracture model.
    Gebauer M; Stark O; Vettorazzi E; Grifka J; Püschel K; Amling M; Beckmann J
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 24019186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength.
    Carpenter RD; Beaupré GS; Lang TF; Orwoll ES; Carter DR;
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1533-42. PubMed ID: 16059625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract.
    Birnbaum K; Siebert CH; Pandorf T; Schopphoff E; Prescher A; Niethard FU
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Dec; 26(6):433-46. PubMed ID: 15378277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Augmentation of femoral neck fracture fixation with an injectable calcium-phosphate bone mineral cement.
    Stankewich CJ; Swiontkowski MF; Tencer AF; Yetkinler DN; Poser RD
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):786-93. PubMed ID: 8893773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knowles pinning of experimental femoral neck fractures: biomechanical study.
    Rubin R; Trent P; Arnold W; Burstein A
    J Trauma; 1981 Dec; 21(12):1036-9. PubMed ID: 7321065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A biomechanical study of two methods of internal fixation of unstable fractures of the femoral neck. A preliminary study.
    Goodman SB; Davidson JA; Locke L; Novotny S; Jones H; Csongradi JJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 1992; 6(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 1556626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoral neck strength of mouse in two loading configurations: method evaluation and fracture characteristics.
    Jämsä T; Tuukkanen J; Jalovaara P
    J Biomech; 1998 Aug; 31(8):723-9. PubMed ID: 9796672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of 3 possible fixation strategies to resist femoral neck shortening after fracture.
    Alves T; Neal JW; Weinhold PS; Dahners LE
    Orthopedics; 2010 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 20415297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Biomechanical research of less invasive stabilization system and dynamic condylar screw in fixing subtrochanteric fractures of femur].
    Yang Y; Ma X; Ma J; Zhu S; Ma B; Ji S; Ma T; Chen Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1213-7. PubMed ID: 23167106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does a trochanteric lag screw improve fixation of vertically oriented femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical analysis in cadaveric bone.
    Hawks MA; Kim H; Strauss JE; Oliphant BW; Golden RD; Hsieh AH; Nascone JW; O'Toole RV
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Oct; 28(8):886-91. PubMed ID: 24050951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Locking plates and their effects on healing conditions and stress distribution: A femoral neck fracture study in cadavers.
    Basso T; Klaksvik J; Foss OA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 May; 29(5):595-8. PubMed ID: 24726777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is bone-cement augmentation of screw-anchor fixation systems superior in unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical cadaveric study.
    Knobe M; Bettag S; Kammerlander C; Altgassen S; Maier KJ; Nebelung S; Prescher A; Horst K; Pishnamaz M; Herren C; Mundt M; Stoffel M; Markert B; Gueorguiev B
    Injury; 2019 Feb; 50(2):292-300. PubMed ID: 30473370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk.
    Bryan R; Nair PB; Taylor M
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2171-6. PubMed ID: 19646700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
    Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
    J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of geometric factors and failure load level with the distribution of cervical vs. trochanteric hip fractures.
    Pulkkinen P; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Kuhn V; Jämsä T
    J Bone Miner Res; 2006 Jun; 21(6):895-901. PubMed ID: 16753020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screw positions in femoral neck fractures. Comparison of two different screw positions in cadavers.
    Lindequist S; Wredmark T; Eriksson SA; Samnegård E
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1993 Feb; 64(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 8451951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does screw configuration affect subtrochanteric fracture after femoral neck fixation?
    Oakey JW; Stover MD; Summers HD; Sartori M; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Feb; 443():302-6. PubMed ID: 16462455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection.
    Mardones RM; Gonzalez C; Chen Q; Zobitz M; Kaufman KR; Trousdale RT
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Feb; 87(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 15687147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of interlocking parallel screws in subcapital femoral-neck fracture fixation: a cadaver study.
    Basso T; Klaksvik J; Foss OA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Feb; 29(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 24325974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.