These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12596401)

  • 61. [The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section].
    Habek D; Kulas T; Karsa M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2007 Apr; 61(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 17585470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Letter: Caesarean section.
    Williams EA
    Lancet; 1976 Jan; 1(7952):193. PubMed ID: 54699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Modified Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: clinical experience.
    Kulas T; Habek D; Karsa M; Bobić-Vuković M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2008; 65(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 18196903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparative evaluation of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section with two traditional techniques. The first four years' experience.
    Varga P; Bódis J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Jan; 80(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 11167198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
    Chelmow D; Rodriguez EJ; Sabatini MM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 103(5 Pt 1):974-80. PubMed ID: 15121573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Counseling women about elective cesarean section.
    Sagadyleslie M
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2004; 49(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 15010671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Extraperitoneal cesarean section. II. Present views].
    Zábranský F
    Cesk Gynekol; 1987 Feb; 52(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 3568165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A new uterine suture technique to control PPH in congenitally malformed uterus during caesarean section.
    Halder A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jul; 29(5):402-4. PubMed ID: 19603317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A very low transverse uterine incision.
    Shukunami K; Orisaka M; Nishijima K; Yoshii K; Senda T; Yoshida Y; Kotsuji F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):269-70. PubMed ID: 16377068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [''Rapid'' cesarean section according to Stark: personal modifications].
    Stradella L; Gioino E; La Rezza F; Granata A
    Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Apr; 60(2):201-2. PubMed ID: 18487971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Superficial fascial system repair: an abdominoplasty technique to reduce local complications after caesarean delivery.
    Al-Benna S; Al-Ajam Y; Tzakas E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 May; 279(5):673-5. PubMed ID: 18810475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Routine cervical dilatation during elective cesarean section and its influence on maternal morbidity: a randomized controlled study.
    Ahmed B; Abu Nahia F; Abushama M
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(6):510-3. PubMed ID: 16318613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparative study of the ''Misgav Ladach'' and traditional Pfannenstiel surgical techniques for cesarean section.
    Belci D; Kos M; Zoricić D; Kuharić L; Slivar A; Begić-Razem E; Grdinić I
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Jun; 59(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 17576402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
    Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Trends versus tradition in cesarean surgery: effects on midwifery practice and cesarean mothers' future pregnancies.
    Gaskin IM
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (82):32-4. PubMed ID: 17725126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Arguments against cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence].
    Dupuis O
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Mar; 35(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 17293154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The uterine 1-layer closure.
    Escamilla JO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1503; author reply 1503-4. PubMed ID: 15507992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Conservative surgery for uterine incisional necrosis complicating cesarean delivery.
    Rivlin ME; Carroll CS; Morrison JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 103(5 Pt 2):1105-8. PubMed ID: 15121624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure versus standard cesarean section.
    Kuczkowski KM
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2007 Nov; 26(11):1003-4. PubMed ID: 17935936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Reverse breech extraction for cesarean section.
    Iffy L; Apuzzio JJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 May; 126(1):126; author reply 127. PubMed ID: 16387408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.