These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12596792)

  • 1. Simulation-based P values: response to North et al.
    Broman KW; Caffo BS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Feb; 72(2):496. PubMed ID: 12596792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On estimating P values by the Monte Carlo method.
    Ewens WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Feb; 72(2):496-8. PubMed ID: 12596794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A note on calculation of empirical P values from Monte Carlo procedure.
    North BV; Curtis D; Sham PC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Feb; 72(2):498-9. PubMed ID: 12596795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ensemble confidence intervals for binomial proportions.
    Park H; Leemis LM
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3460-3475. PubMed ID: 31099897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical inference involving binomial and negative binomial parameters.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):288-307. PubMed ID: 19476241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters.
    Agresti A; Bini M; Bertaccini B; Ryu E
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1270-5. PubMed ID: 18266891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On using an approximate noncentral t-distribution in determining a one-side upper limit for future sample relative reproducibility standard deviations.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(2):575-81. PubMed ID: 17474527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the sample size for studies based upon McNemar's test.
    Lachenbruch PA
    Stat Med; 1992 Aug; 11(11):1521-5. PubMed ID: 1410964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-intensive statistical procedures.
    Ludbrook J
    Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol; 2000; 35(5):339-58. PubMed ID: 11099050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimators and confidence intervals for the proportion using binary auxiliary information with applications to pharmaceutical studies.
    Rueda M; Muñoz JF; Arcos A; Álvarez E; Martínez S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):526-54. PubMed ID: 21442524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independence estimating equations for controlled clinical trials with small sample sizes--interval estimation.
    Dahmen G; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2006; 45(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 16964361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Profile likelihood-based confidence intervals using Monte Carlo integration for population pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Funatogawa T; Funatogawa I; Yafune A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 16584067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical inferences for a twin correlation with multinomial outcomes.
    Bartfay E; Donner A
    Stat Med; 2001 Jan; 20(2):249-62. PubMed ID: 11169600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An efficient Monte Carlo method for estimating Ne from temporally spaced samples using a coalescent-based likelihood.
    Anderson EC
    Genetics; 2005 Jun; 170(2):955-67. PubMed ID: 15834143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis.
    Huizenga HM; van Zuijen TL; Heslenfeld DJ; Molenaar PC
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jul; 46(7):1737-51. PubMed ID: 11474922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do we draw inference from "negative" studies?
    Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 12514684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Handling non-negativity in deconvolution of physiological signals: a nonlinear stochastic approach.
    Pillonetto G; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 30(8):1077-87. PubMed ID: 12449768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials.
    Sankoh AJ; Huque MF; Dubey SD
    Stat Med; 1997 Nov; 16(22):2529-42. PubMed ID: 9403954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Baumgartner-Weiss-Schindler test in the presence of ties.
    Neuhäuser M
    Biometrics; 2002 Mar; 58(1):250-1. PubMed ID: 11890324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.