These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12596825)

  • 1. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality assessment tools for radiation dose optimization in digital radiography: an overview.
    Seeram E; Davidson R; Bushong S; Swan H
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 24806056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
    Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; John V; Gocke P
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The evaluation of digital X-ray images on CRT monitor display].
    Itoh Y; Ishigaki T; Sakuma S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Aug; 48(8):1024-31. PubMed ID: 3200684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative assessment of quality of digitized portal images: receiver operating characteristic analysis applied to imaging in radiation therapy.
    Okajima K; Nakata M; Yano S; Nagata Y; Kimura I; Nakano Y; Abe M
    Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):273-6. PubMed ID: 1909447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Brown ME; Feig SA; Jong RA; Maidment AD; Staiger MJ; Kuzmiak CM; Freimanis RI; Lesko N; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Williford M; Braeuning MP
    Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 12511684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychophysical aspects in medical illumination techniques.
    Giacomuzzi SM; Buchberger W; Peer R; Peer S; Bale R; Perkmann R; Jaschke W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):197-9. PubMed ID: 11487836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The diagnostic value of digital and conventional imaging in intravenous urography].
    Hundt C; Kohz P; Leinsinger G; Fink U; Schätzl M
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 8527752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response to ROC steady.
    Hanley JA; Begg CB
    Med Decis Making; 1987; 7(4):244-6. PubMed ID: 3683112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance evaluation of radiologists with artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of intra-axial cerebral tumors on MR images.
    Yamashita K; Yoshiura T; Arimura H; Mihara F; Noguchi T; Hiwatashi A; Togao O; Yamashita Y; Shono T; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y; Honda H
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Jun; 29(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 18388216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Judgment of the efficacy of digital image diagnosis and ROC analysis].
    Shiraishi J
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jan; 58(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 12596825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A ROC analysis for comparing contrast perception in grey scale reversal of digital images].
    Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Horwitz AE; Lackner K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2018803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.