BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12596986)

  • 21. Energy response of LiF and Mg2SiO4 TLDs to 10-150 keV monoenergetic photons.
    Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):334-6. PubMed ID: 16381741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimation of bremsstrahlung photon energy in the environment of high-energy electron accelerator using CaSO4:Dy based TL dosemeter.
    Bakshi AK; Nayak MK; Haridas G; Chatterjee S; Kher RK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 17575302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
    Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A legally approved personal dosemeter for photon and beta radiation based on direct ion storage.
    Boschung M; Fiechtner A; Wernli C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12382750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Energy dependence of new thermoluminescent detectors in terms of HP(10) values.
    Miljanić S; Knezević Z; Stuhec M; Ranogajec-Komor M; Krpan K; Vekić B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 14690327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The implementation in routine of the ENEA new personal photon dosemeter.
    Fantuzzi E; Mariotti F; Morelli B; Uleri G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):278-82. PubMed ID: 16644988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. INTERCOMPARISON OF EYE LENS DOSEMETERS.
    Behrens R; Hupe O; Busch F; Denk J; Engelhardt J; Günther K; Hödlmoser H; Jordan M; Strohmaier J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 27009241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of active personal dosemeters as a personal monitoring device: comparison with TL dosimetry.
    Boziari A; Koukorava C; Carinou E; Hourdakis CJ; Kamenopoulou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):173-6. PubMed ID: 21196464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
    Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Type testing of a new TLD for the UK Health Protection Agency.
    Gilvin PJ; Baker ST; Daniels TJ; Eakins JD; McClure DR; Bartlett DT; Boucher C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17513291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ENEA personal dosemeters for assessing Hp(10) and Hp(0.07).
    Bedogni R; Fantuzzi E; Monteventi F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):187-90. PubMed ID: 11586726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Type testing the Model 6600 plus automatic TLD reader.
    Velbeck KJ; Luo LZ; Streetz KL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):303-6. PubMed ID: 16835278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inter-comparison among different TLD-based techniques in a standard multisphere assembly for the characterisation of neutron fields.
    Bedogni R; Angelone M; Esposito A; Chiti M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):369-72. PubMed ID: 16709710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Energy response of different types of RADOS personal dosemeters with MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) and MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) TL detectors.
    Obryk B; Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Budzanowski M; Olko P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):211-4. PubMed ID: 21227957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A proposed four-element neutron-photon-beta thermoluminescence dosimeter.
    Liu JC; Sims CS; Ahmed AB
    Health Phys; 1992 Sep; 63(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 1644568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. DEVELOPMENT OF AN ALGORITHM TO ESTIMATE EYE LENS DOSE IN TERMS OF OPERATIONAL QUANTITY Hp(3) USING HEAD TLD BADGE.
    Madhumita B; Sneha C; Dipali V; Pradhan SM; Bakshi AK; Datta D; Tripathi SM; Singh SK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Mar; 178(4):364-373. PubMed ID: 28981726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical aspects of the Naval Dosimetry Center quality assurance programme.
    St John TJ; Cassata JR; Blake PK; Wallace WH; Minniti R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):273-7. PubMed ID: 16757494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproducibility of TL measurements in a mixed field of thermal neutrons and photons.
    Fernandes AC; Gonçalves IC; Ferro Carvalho A; Santos J; Cardoso J; Santos L; Osvay M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):481-4. PubMed ID: 12382796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Studies on the response of the TLD badge for high-energy photons.
    Kumar M; Kher RK; Sahni G; Chhokra K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 17681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intercomparison exercise within a distributed-dosimetry network.
    Romanyukha A; Voss SP; Benevides LA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):300-5. PubMed ID: 21088021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.