These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12596986)

  • 41. Performance of different thermoluminescence dosimeters in 90SR+90Y radiation fields.
    Oliveira ML; Caldas LV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 15367762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Studies on energy response of newly developed LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL chips with additional PbO doping.
    Tang K; Fan H; Cui H; Zhu H; Liu Z
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 24962516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Portable TL dosemeter--ESD phantom combination for chest and lumbar spine radiography.
    Niittymäki H; Hakanen A; Rautio S; Järvinen H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 18204082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Response of TL materials to diagnostic radiology X radiation beams.
    Maia AF; Caldas LV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):780-3. PubMed ID: 20097569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors.
    Olko P; Bilski P; El-Faramawy NA; Göksu HY; Kim JL; Kopec R; Waligórski MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):15-22. PubMed ID: 16644968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Relationship between protection and operational quantities in dosimetry of photon external exposure-deficiencies of Hp(10).
    Chumak VV; Bakhanova EV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 12918787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Characterization of nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence detectors and high-sensitivity MCP-N thermoluminescent detectors in the 40-300 kVp energy range.
    Poirier Y; Kuznetsova S; Villarreal-Barajas JE
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):402-413. PubMed ID: 29164632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Determination of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL efficiency for X-rays and their application to Monte Carlo simulations of dosemeter response.
    Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Olko P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):483-6. PubMed ID: 16822775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The energy and directional response of Harshaw TLD-100 thermoluminescent dosimeters in the diagnostic X-ray energy range.
    Morgan TJ; Brateman L
    Health Phys; 1977 Oct; 33(4):339-41. PubMed ID: 599036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. EDEL: ENEA DOSEMETER FOR EYE LENS.
    Ferrari P; Mariotti F; Campani L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):145-9. PubMed ID: 26170436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Application of whole-body personal TL dosemeters in mixed field beta-gamma radiation.
    Ciupek K; Aksamit D; Wołoszczuk K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Nov; 162(1-2):20-3. PubMed ID: 25009188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Photon beam audits for radiation therapy clinics: a pilot mailed dosemeter study in Turkey.
    Yegingil Z; DeWerd LA; Davis SD; Hammer C; Kunugi K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 21362695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of the phantom shape (slab, cylinder or Alderson) on the performance of an Hp(3) eye dosemeter.
    Behrens R; Hupe O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Mar; 168(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 26170437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intercomparison measurements of extremity dosemeters in beta and/or photon radiation fields.
    Helmstädter K; Ambrosi P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):183-6. PubMed ID: 11586725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Calculated angular responses of an RPL dosemeter to photon and beta radiation.
    Hocine N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 22361351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. CHARACTERIZATION AND PERFORMANCE TESTS OF A NEW OSL/TL PERSONAL DOSEMETER FOR INDIVIDUAL MONITORING.
    Malthez ALMC; Yoshimura EM; Button VLSN; Freitas MB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29684169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Study on the response of indigenously developed CaSO4:Dy phosphor-based neutron dosemeter.
    Bakshi AK; Pradhan AS; Kher RK; Srivastava K; Varadharajan G; Chatterjee S; Sathian V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jan; 133(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 19264830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality assurance of personal beta particle dosemeters used for individual monitoring of occupationally exposed persons.
    Helmstädter K; Ambrosi P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):105-8. PubMed ID: 17337739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
    Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.