BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12599229)

  • 1. Caveolin-1 expression is a predictor of recurrence-free survival in pT2N0 prostate carcinoma diagnosed in Japanese patients.
    Satoh T; Yang G; Egawa S; Addai J; Frolov A; Kuwao S; Timme TL; Baba S; Thompson TC
    Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 12599229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined c-Myc and caveolin-1 expression in human prostate carcinoma predicts prostate carcinoma progression.
    Yang G; Timme TL; Frolov A; Wheeler TM; Thompson TC
    Cancer; 2005 Mar; 103(6):1186-94. PubMed ID: 15712208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caveolin-1 expression in clinically confined human prostate cancer: a novel prognostic marker.
    Yang G; Truong LD; Wheeler TM; Thompson TC
    Cancer Res; 1999 Nov; 59(22):5719-23. PubMed ID: 10582690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy in men with pathologic organ-confined disease: pT2a versus pT2b.
    Freedland SJ; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
    Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1646-9. PubMed ID: 15073852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
    Kausik SJ; Blute ML; Sebo TJ; Leibovich BC; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Zincke H
    Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Iocca A; Scherer B; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 11125379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Androgen receptor expression in prostate cancer lymph node metastases is predictive of outcome after surgery.
    Sweat SD; Pacelli A; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Cheng L; Bostwick DG
    J Urol; 1999 Apr; 161(4):1233-7. PubMed ID: 10081876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion.
    Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Brenner PC; Kooner R; Golovsky D; O'Neill GF; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1884-93. PubMed ID: 12673714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural history of disease progression in patients who fail to achieve an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level after undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Rogers CG; Khan MA; Craig Miller M; Veltri RW; Partin AW
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 101(11):2549-56. PubMed ID: 15470681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
    Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
    Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
    Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual estimation of tumour extent is not an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence.
    Jones TD; Koch MO; Lin H; Cheng L
    BJU Int; 2005 Dec; 96(9):1253-7. PubMed ID: 16287440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vascular invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of risk based on pathologic variables.
    Ferrari MK; McNeal JE; Malhotra SM; Brooks JD
    Urology; 2004 Oct; 64(4):749-53. PubMed ID: 15491714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
    Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.