These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12599229)

  • 1. Caveolin-1 expression is a predictor of recurrence-free survival in pT2N0 prostate carcinoma diagnosed in Japanese patients.
    Satoh T; Yang G; Egawa S; Addai J; Frolov A; Kuwao S; Timme TL; Baba S; Thompson TC
    Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 12599229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined c-Myc and caveolin-1 expression in human prostate carcinoma predicts prostate carcinoma progression.
    Yang G; Timme TL; Frolov A; Wheeler TM; Thompson TC
    Cancer; 2005 Mar; 103(6):1186-94. PubMed ID: 15712208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caveolin-1 expression in clinically confined human prostate cancer: a novel prognostic marker.
    Yang G; Truong LD; Wheeler TM; Thompson TC
    Cancer Res; 1999 Nov; 59(22):5719-23. PubMed ID: 10582690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy in men with pathologic organ-confined disease: pT2a versus pT2b.
    Freedland SJ; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
    Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1646-9. PubMed ID: 15073852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
    Kausik SJ; Blute ML; Sebo TJ; Leibovich BC; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Zincke H
    Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Iocca A; Scherer B; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 11125379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Androgen receptor expression in prostate cancer lymph node metastases is predictive of outcome after surgery.
    Sweat SD; Pacelli A; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Cheng L; Bostwick DG
    J Urol; 1999 Apr; 161(4):1233-7. PubMed ID: 10081876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion.
    Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Brenner PC; Kooner R; Golovsky D; O'Neill GF; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1884-93. PubMed ID: 12673714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural history of disease progression in patients who fail to achieve an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level after undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Rogers CG; Khan MA; Craig Miller M; Veltri RW; Partin AW
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 101(11):2549-56. PubMed ID: 15470681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
    Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
    Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
    Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual estimation of tumour extent is not an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence.
    Jones TD; Koch MO; Lin H; Cheng L
    BJU Int; 2005 Dec; 96(9):1253-7. PubMed ID: 16287440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vascular invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of risk based on pathologic variables.
    Ferrari MK; McNeal JE; Malhotra SM; Brooks JD
    Urology; 2004 Oct; 64(4):749-53. PubMed ID: 15491714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
    Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.