200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12601041)
41. A new mouse-fixation device for IOP measurement in awake mice.
Guo J; Yang J; Huang H; Wu K; Wu X; Wang H; He Y; Bi F; Hu C; Gong B; Zhang H
Vision Res; 2024 Jun; 219():108397. PubMed ID: 38579406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.
Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes].
Deuter CM; Schlote T; Hahn GA; Bende T; Derse M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Mar; 219(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11987041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Calibration of the TonoLab tonometer in mice with spontaneous or experimental glaucoma.
Pease ME; Cone FE; Gelman S; Son JL; Quigley HA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Feb; 52(2):858-64. PubMed ID: 20720229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.
Bhan A; Browning AC; Shah S; Hamilton R; Dave D; Dua HS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1389-92. PubMed ID: 11980851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The efficacy of TonoLab in detecting physiological and pharmacological changes of mouse intraocular pressure--comparison with TonoPen and microneedle manometery.
Saeki T; Aihara M; Ohashi M; Araie M
Curr Eye Res; 2008 Mar; 33(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 18350435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.
Tonnu PA; Ho T; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. In vitro and in vivo comparison of applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in dogs.
Nagata N; Yuki M; Hasegawa T
J Vet Med Sci; 2011 Dec; 73(12):1585-9. PubMed ID: 21804316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Noninvasive intraocular pressure measurements in mice by pneumotonometry.
Avila MY; Múnera A; Guzmán A; Do CW; Wang Z; Stone RA; Civan MM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Sep; 46(9):3274-80. PubMed ID: 16123429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness.
Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A
Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effect of body position on intraocular pressure in calves.
Kurt B; Çağatay HH; Aksoy Ö
J S Afr Vet Assoc; 2018 Aug; 89(0):e1-e3. PubMed ID: 30198297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of general anesthetics on IOP in rats with experimental aqueous outflow obstruction.
Jia L; Cepurna WO; Johnson EC; Morrison JC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 41(11):3415-9. PubMed ID: 11006233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Home tonometry for management of pediatric glaucoma.
Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 152(3):470-478.e2. PubMed ID: 21689808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious Hermann's tortoises (Testudo hermanni) by means of rebound tonometry.
Selleri P; Di Girolamo N; Andreani V; Guandalini A; D'Anna N
Am J Vet Res; 2012 Nov; 73(11):1807-12. PubMed ID: 23106468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
