These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12601323)
1. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss. Hone SW; Norman G; Keogh I; Kelly V Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 12601323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry. Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Lin YH; Chen PR; Hsu CJ; Wu HP J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jan; 123(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18452631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population. Chien CH; Tu TY; Shiao AS; Chien SF; Wang YF; Li AC; Yang MJ ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses. Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects. Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss. Shupak A; Tal D; Sharoni Z; Oren M; Ravid A; Pratt H Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 17721363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment]. Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cortical evoked response audiometry thresholds and neuroleptic, sedative, hypnotic drugs. Dejonckere PH; Lebacq J; Coryn C Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 14689614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cortical evoked potential criteria in the objective assessment of auditory threshold: a comparison of noise induced hearing loss with Ménière's disease. Prasher D; Mula M; Luxon L J Laryngol Otol; 1993 Sep; 107(9):780-6. PubMed ID: 8228590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population. Blanchet C; Pommie C; Mondain M; Berr C; Hillaire D; Puel JL Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 18520580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise-exposed workers. Hsu RF; Chen SS; Lu SN; Ho CK; Lin HF Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):330-5. PubMed ID: 21802644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of thresholds acquired with ASSR and PTA in normal-hearing subjects]. Yang XP; Fan LH; Zhou XR; Zhu GY Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 24(4):248-51. PubMed ID: 18817031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Agreement between auditory threshold calculated from cortical evoked response audiometry and tone audiometry in occupational hearing loss]. Janisch R; Jerábek J Cesk Otolaryngol; 1990 Aug; 39(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 2289246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of hearing thresholds: comparison of cortical evoked response audiometry and auditory steady state response audiometry techniques. Yeung KN; Wong LL Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17365051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds. Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry. Scherf F; Brokx J; Wuyts FL; Van de Heyning PH Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 16717018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in chronic noise-induced hearing loss. Wang YP; Young YH Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 137(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 17903578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory evoked potentials for the assessment of noise induced hearing loss. Fabiani M; Mattioni A; Saponara M; Cordier A Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 48():147-53. PubMed ID: 9505307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]