BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12601515)

  • 1. The impact of delivery on anorectal function in women with and women without anal incontinence--a prospective study.
    Højberg KE; Hundborg HH; Ryhammer AM; Laurberg S
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2003 Feb; 14(1):38-45; discussion 45. PubMed ID: 12601515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse. Differences between continent and incontinent individuals.
    Roig JV; Buch E; Alós R; Solana A; Fernández C; Villoslada C; García-Armengol J; Hinojosa J
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1998 Nov; 90(11):794-805. PubMed ID: 9866412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Viscoelastic assessment of anal canal function using acoustic reflectometry: a clinically useful technique.
    Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Telford KJ; Hosker GL; Lose G; Kiff ES
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Feb; 55(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 22228166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery.
    Sultan AH; Kamm MA; Hudson CN; Thomas JM; Bartram CI
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Dec; 329(26):1905-11. PubMed ID: 8247054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The utility of pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies in idiopathic incontinence.
    Ricciardi R; Mellgren AF; Madoff RD; Baxter NN; Karulf RE; Parker SC
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Jun; 49(6):852-7. PubMed ID: 16598403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency is associated with decreased resting and squeeze pressures in the intact anal sphincter.
    Loganathan A; Schloithe AC; Hakendorf P; Liyanage CM; Costa M; Wattchow D
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1410-5. PubMed ID: 23895054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Childbirth and incontinence: a prospective study on anal sphincter morphology and function before and early after vaginal delivery.
    Willis S; Faridi A; Schelzig S; Hoelzl F; Kasperk R; Rath W; Schumpelick V
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2002 Jun; 387(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 12111263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Anal incontinence in patients with rectal neoplasms previous to surgical intervention].
    DeMiguel M; Ortíz H; Garrido JR; Morales G; Armendáriz P
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1996 Jan; 88(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8615997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anal sphincter EMG in anorectal disorders.
    Strijers RL; Felt-Bersma RJ; Visser SL; Meuwissen SG
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 29(7-8):405-8. PubMed ID: 2606065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency to squeeze pressure in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence.
    Súilleabháin CB; Horgan AF; McEnroe L; Poon FW; Anderson JH; Finlay IG; McKee RF
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 May; 44(5):666-71. PubMed ID: 11357026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical consequences of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery.
    Fornell EK; Berg G; Hallböök O; Matthiesen LS; Sjödahl R
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Dec; 183(6):553-8. PubMed ID: 8957456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing does not provide useful information in guiding therapy for fecal incontinence.
    Saraidaridis JT; Molina G; Savit LR; Milch H; Mei T; Chin S; Kuo J; Bordeianou L
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Mar; 33(3):305-310. PubMed ID: 29330765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Normal ranges for anorectal manometry and sensation in women of reproductive age.
    Chaliha C; Sultan AH; Emmanuel AV
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):839-44. PubMed ID: 17509053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse.
    Glasgow SC; Birnbaum EH; Kodner IJ; Fleshman JW; Dietz DW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Jul; 49(7):1052-8. PubMed ID: 16649117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sphincter rupture in the course of labor].
    Sørensen M; Tetzschner T; Rasmussen OO; Bjarnesen J; Christiansen J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 May; 156(21):3173-5. PubMed ID: 8066835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extracorporeal magnetic stimulation of the pelvic floor: impact on anorectal function and physiology. A pilot study.
    Thornton MJ; Kennedy ML; Lubowski DZ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Oct; 48(10):1945-50. PubMed ID: 16132478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative electromyography of the anal sphincter after uncomplicated vaginal delivery.
    Gregory WT; Lou JS; Stuyvesant A; Clark AL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 104(2):327-35. PubMed ID: 15292007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vaginal delivery after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a word of caution.
    Remzi FH; Gorgun E; Bast J; Schroeder T; Hammel J; Philipson E; Hull TL; Church JM; Fazio VW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Sep; 48(9):1691-9. PubMed ID: 16142432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fecal incontinence and the anorectal angle.
    Kuypers JH
    Neth J Surg; 1984 Feb; 36(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 6700823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining the strength-duration curve of the external anal sphincter with manometry for the assessment of faecal incontinence.
    Monk DN; Mills P; Jeacock J; Deakin M; Cowie A; Kiff ES
    Br J Surg; 1998 Oct; 85(10):1389-93. PubMed ID: 9782022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.