BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12602079)

  • 1. Incorporation of genuine prior information in cost-effectiveness analysis of clinical trial data.
    Stevens JW; O'Hagan A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(4):782-90. PubMed ID: 12602079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Briggs AH
    Health Econ; 1999 May; 8(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10348420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Bayesian approach to economic analyses of clinical trials: the case of stenting versus balloon angioplasty.
    Al MJ; Van Hout BA
    Health Econ; 2000 Oct; 9(7):599-609. PubMed ID: 11103926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies.
    Claxton K
    J Health Econ; 1999 Jun; 18(3):341-64. PubMed ID: 10537899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian methods for design and analysis of cost-effectiveness trials in the evaluation of health care technologies.
    O'Hagan A; Stevens JW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2002 Dec; 11(6):469-90. PubMed ID: 12516985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Bayesian approach for the cost-effectiveness evaluation of healthcare technologies].
    Berchialla P; Gregori D; Brunello F; Veltri A; Petrinco M; Pagano E
    Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 19776461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. An illustration and application to blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes.
    Briggs AH
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 11329846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The choice of sample size: a mixed Bayesian / frequentist approach.
    Pezeshk H; Nematollahi N; Maroufy V; Gittins J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2009 Apr; 18(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 18445695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian assessment of sample size for clinical trials of cost-effectiveness.
    O'Hagan A; Stevens JW
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(3):219-30. PubMed ID: 11386629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should commercial-in-confidence data be used by decision makers when making assessments of cost-effectiveness?
    Drummond M
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2002; 1(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 14619251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review.
    Spiegelhalter DJ; Myles JP; Jones DR; Abrams KR
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(38):1-130. PubMed ID: 11134920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A C++ program to calculate sample sizes for cost-effectiveness trials in a Bayesian framework.
    Sarker SJ; Whitehead A; Khan I
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jun; 110(3):471-89. PubMed ID: 23399102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating health economics modeling in the product development cycle of medical devices: a Bayesian approach.
    Vallejo-Torres L; Steuten LM; Buxton MJ; Girling AJ; Lilford RJ; Young T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 18828941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The contrast and convergence of Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches in pharmacoeconomic analysis.
    Skrepnek GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(8):649-64. PubMed ID: 17640107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complementing the net benefit approach: a new framework for Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hernández MA; Vázquez-Polo FJ; González-Torre FJ; Bas EM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 19845984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies.
    Briggs AH; O'Brien BJ; Blackhouse G
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2002; 23():377-401. PubMed ID: 11910068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction to Bayesian reasoning.
    Hornberger J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11329848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost effectiveness scenario analysis for a proposed trial of hormone replacement therapy.
    Townsend J; Buxton M
    Health Policy; 1997 Mar; 39(3):181-94. PubMed ID: 10165460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can Bayesian methods make data and analyses more relevant to decision makers? A perspective from Medicare.
    Sheingold SH
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 11329838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.