These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12602619)

  • 1. Cokriging optimization of monitoring network configuration based on fuzzy and non-fuzzy variogram evaluation.
    Passarella G; Vurro M; D'Agostino V; Barcelona MJ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003 Feb; 82(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 12602619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computationally efficient approach for identification of fuzzy dynamic groundwater sampling network.
    Kumari K; Jain S; Dhar A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Apr; 191(5):310. PubMed ID: 31030264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal expansion of water quality monitoring network by fuzzy optimization approach.
    Ning SK; Chang NB
    Environ Monit Assess; 2004 Feb; 91(1-3):145-70. PubMed ID: 14969441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A fuzzy logic approach to assess groundwater pollution levels below agricultural fields.
    Muhammetoglu A; Yardimci A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Jul; 118(1-3):337-54. PubMed ID: 16897549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of fertirrigation efficiency in strawberry crops by application of fuzzy logic techniques.
    de la Torre ML; Grande JA; Aroba J; Andujar JM
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Nov; 7(11):1085-92. PubMed ID: 16252058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties.
    Guo P; Huang GH
    Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 19854040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement of water table interpolation and groundwater storage volume using fuzzy computations.
    Masoumi Z; Rezaei A; Maleki J
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 May; 191(6):401. PubMed ID: 31134353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An inexact optimization approach for river water-quality management.
    Karmakar S; Mujumdar PP
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Nov; 81(3):233-48. PubMed ID: 16545902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A fuzzy index model for trophic status evaluation of reservoir waters.
    Liou YT; Lo SL
    Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(7):1415-23. PubMed ID: 15862342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fuzzy-stochastic characterization of site uncertainty and variability in groundwater flow and contaminant transport through a heterogeneous aquifer.
    Zhang K; Li H; Achari G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):73-82. PubMed ID: 19217686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fuzzy-based assessment of groundwater intrinsic vulnerability of a volcanic aquifer in the Chilean Andean Valley.
    Duhalde DJ; Arumí JL; Oyarzún RA; Rivera DA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jun; 190(7):390. PubMed ID: 29892906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using supervised committee to combine fuzzy logic models.
    Nadiri AA; Gharekhani M; Khatibi R; Moghaddam AA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(9):8562-8577. PubMed ID: 28194673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of uncertainty arising from different soil sampling devices: the use of variogram parameters.
    de Zorzi P; Barbizzi S; Belli M; Barbina M; Fajgelj A; Jacimovic R; Jeran Z; Menegon S; Pati A; Petruzzelli G; Sansone U; Van der Perk M
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jan; 70(5):745-52. PubMed ID: 17888487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between a fuzzy logic and a steepest descent approach to optimize a feedforward artificial neural network configuration.
    Sharpe RN; Chow MY
    Int J Neural Syst; 1994 Dec; 5(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 7711962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing the atmospheric sampling sites using fuzzy mathematic methods.
    Fang CS; Wang J; Dong DM; Yu LS
    J Environ Sci (China); 2003 Jul; 15(4):464-8. PubMed ID: 12974305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of groundwater quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation.
    Dahiya S; Singh B; Gaur S; Garg VK; Kushwaha HS
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Aug; 147(3):938-46. PubMed ID: 17337324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coupling geostatistical approaches with PCA and fuzzy optimal model (FOM) for the integrated assessment of sampling locations of water quality monitoring networks (WQMNs).
    Ou C; St-Hilaire A; Ouarda TB; Conly FM; Armstrong N; Khalil B; Proulx-McInnis S
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Dec; 14(12):3118-28. PubMed ID: 23103968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of arsenic concentration in stream water using neuro fuzzy networks with factor analysis.
    Chang FJ; Chung CH; Chen PA; Liu CW; Coynel A; Vachaud G
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():202-10. PubMed ID: 25046611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial interpolation and radiological mapping of ambient gamma dose rate by using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic methods.
    Yeşilkanat CM; Kobya Y; Taşkın H; Çevik U
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 Sep; 175-176():78-93. PubMed ID: 28478281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic design of membership functions for fuzzy-logic control: A case study on one-stage partial nitritation/anammox treatment systems.
    Boiocchi R; Gernaey KV; Sin G
    Water Res; 2016 Oct; 102():346-361. PubMed ID: 27390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.