These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12605749)

  • 1. [Odds ratio or prevalence ratio? Their use in cross-sectional studies].
    Schiaffino A; Rodríguez M; Pasarín MI; Regidor E; Borrell C; Fernández E
    Gac Sanit; 2003; 17(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 12605749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different methods to calculate effect estimates in cross-sectional studies. A comparison between prevalence odds ratio and prevalence ratio.
    Behrens T; Taeger D; Wellmann J; Keil U
    Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 15702210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio.
    Barros AJ; Hirakata VN
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Oct; 3():21. PubMed ID: 14567763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative log-binomial model with optimal robust variance to estimate the prevalence ratio, in cross-sectional population studies.
    Ibáñez-Pinilla M; Villalba-Niño S; Olaya-Galán NN
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):219. PubMed ID: 37794385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obtaining adjusted prevalence ratios from logistic regression models in cross-sectional studies.
    Bastos LS; Oliveira Rde V; Velasque Lde S
    Cad Saude Publica; 2015 Mar; 31(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 25859716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing.
    Skov T; Deddens J; Petersen MR; Endahl L
    Int J Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 27(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 9563700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Odds Ratio or Prevalence Ratio? An Overview of Reported Statistical Methods and Appropriateness of Interpretations in Cross-sectional Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes in Veterinary Medicine.
    Martinez BAF; Leotti VB; Silva GSE; Nunes LN; Machado G; Corbellini LG
    Front Vet Sci; 2017; 4():193. PubMed ID: 29177157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating adjusted prevalence ratio in clustered cross-sectional epidemiological data.
    Santos CA; Fiaccone RL; Oliveira NF; Cunha S; Barreto ML; do Carmo MB; Moncayo AL; Rodrigues LC; Cooper PJ; Amorim LD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Dec; 8():80. PubMed ID: 19087281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between prevalence rate ratios and odds ratios in cross-sectional studies.
    Zocchetti C; Consonni D; Bertazzi PA
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Feb; 26(1):220-3. PubMed ID: 9126523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applied Prevalence Ratio estimation with different Regression models: An example from a cross-national study on substance use research.
    Espelt A; Marí-Dell'Olmo M; Penelo E; Bosque-Prous M
    Adicciones; 2016 Jun; 29(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 27391846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done?
    Thompson ML; Myers JE; Kriebel D
    Occup Environ Med; 1998 Apr; 55(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 9624282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generalized Confidence Intervals and Fiducial Intervals for Some Epidemiological Measures.
    Bebu I; Luta G; Mathew T; Agan BK
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 27322305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standardized binomial models for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.
    Richardson DB; Kinlaw AC; MacLehose RF; Cole SR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 44(5):1660-72. PubMed ID: 26228585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies.
    Coutinho LM; Scazufca M; Menezes PR
    Rev Saude Publica; 2008 Dec; 42(6):992-8. PubMed ID: 19009156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interval estimation of the proportion ratio under multiple matching.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1275-85. PubMed ID: 15565736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interval estimation of the attributable risk in case-control studies with matched pairs.
    Lui KJ
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Dec; 55(12):885-90. PubMed ID: 11707482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Logistic regression vs other generalized linear models to estimate prevalence rate ratios].
    Traissac P; Martin-Prével Y; Delpeuch F; Maire B
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Dec; 47(6):593-604. PubMed ID: 10673593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measures and models for causal inference in cross-sectional studies: arguments for the appropriateness of the prevalence odds ratio and related logistic regression.
    Reichenheim ME; Coutinho ES
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jul; 10():66. PubMed ID: 20633293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.