These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12607852)

  • 1. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.
    Cha KS
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of maxillary protraction with or without expansion on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects.
    Mucedero M; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Cozza P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):777-81. PubMed ID: 19524838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geometric morphometric assessment of treatment effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin cup appliance on the maxillofacial complex.
    Chang HP; Lin HC; Liu PH; Chang CH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):720-8. PubMed ID: 16159349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Realities of craniofacial growth modification.
    Kluemper GT; Spalding PM
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):23-51. PubMed ID: 11905336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
    Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):555-68. PubMed ID: 15520688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonextraction treatment of a skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    León-Salazar V; Janson G; de Freitas MR; de Almeida RR; León-Salazar R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):736-45. PubMed ID: 19892292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sagittal airway dimensions following maxillary protraction: a pilot study.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 16464873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of face mask therapy with and without rapid maxillary expansion in adolescent patients.
    Yavuz I; Halicioğlu K; Ceylan I; Dağsuyu IM; Erdem A
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 22866596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.