These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12608728)

  • 1. The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Büyükerkmen A; Sari Z
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Feb; 25(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 12608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients.
    Usumez S; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA; Karaman AI; Guray E
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 15529493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cura N; Saraç M
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients.
    McNamara JA; Bookstein FL; Shaughnessy TG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
    Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Late adult skeletofacial growth after adolescent Herbst therapy: a 32-year longitudinal follow-up study.
    Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Hashemi K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 25533068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment.
    Fidler BC; Artun J; Joondeph DR; Little RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 7879760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal and dental effects during observation and treatment with a magnetic device.
    Meral O; Yüksel S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 14719738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal and dento-alveolar changes as a result of headgear activator therapy related to different vertical growth patterns.
    Dermaut LR; van den Eynde F; de Pauw G
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Apr; 14(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 1582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance.
    Janson G; Caffer Dde C; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Neves LS
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):594-604. PubMed ID: 15529492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Vargervik K; Harvold EP
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growth modulation using functional appliances--cephalometric predictors of successful response.
    Kumar SA; Shetty KS; Prakash AT
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e50-9. PubMed ID: 23646338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
    Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Bilgiç F; Hamamci O; Başaran G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.