These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12609942)

  • 1. Survey of claims of no effect in abstracts of Cochrane reviews.
    Alderson P; Chalmers I
    BMJ; 2003 Mar; 326(7387):475. PubMed ID: 12609942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
    Turpin DL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting of effect direction and size in abstracts of systematic reviews.
    Beller EM; Glasziou PP; Hopewell S; Altman DG
    JAMA; 2011 Nov; 306(18):1981-2. PubMed ID: 22068989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structured abstracts for clinical research manuscripts and reviews.
    Squires BP; Keith RG; Meakins JL
    Can J Surg; 1992 Oct; 35(5):473-5. PubMed ID: 1393858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews.
    Hartley J
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 2000 Oct; 88(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 11055300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emphasis on the need for guidelines for documentation of search strategy and results was needed, criticism of a Cochrane review was not.
    Santesso N
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Oct; 92(4):393-4; author reply 394. PubMed ID: 15494751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Liu J; Huda F; Atieh M
    J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals.
    Seehra J; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2013 Apr; 121(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 23489893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Writing the abstract: completeness and accuracy matter.
    von Elm E
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):483-4. PubMed ID: 21659806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reporting quality of meta-analysis results of systematic review abstracts in periodontology and implant dentistry is suboptimal.
    Polychronopoulou A
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2014 Dec; 14(4):209-10. PubMed ID: 25488877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles.
    Mulrow CD; Thacker SB; Pugh JA
    Ann Intern Med; 1988 Apr; 108(4):613-5. PubMed ID: 3348568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Structured abstracting of scientific medical publications].
    Dabrowiecki S; Malukiewicz-Wiśniewska G
    Przegl Lek; 1995; 52(3):105-8. PubMed ID: 7644674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of abstracts in the context of a systematic review on parenting of children with chronic health conditions and disabilities.
    Cimino T; Lach LM; Mechan K; Saini M; Nimigon-Young J; McNeill T; Nicholas D; Rosenbaum P
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2011 Jul; 8(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 21827304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality and clarity in systematic review abstracts: an empirical study.
    Tsou AY; Treadwell JR
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):447-458. PubMed ID: 27764903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting quality of systematic review abstracts in leading oral implantology journals.
    Kiriakou J; Pandis N; Fleming PS; Madianos P; Polychronopoulou A
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1181-7. PubMed ID: 24075952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploiting the systematic review protocol for classification of medical abstracts.
    Frunza O; Inkpen D; Matwin S; Klement W; O'Blenis P
    Artif Intell Med; 2011 Jan; 51(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 21084178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minor Comments.
    JAMA; 2017 Jun; 317(22):2339. PubMed ID: 28609524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy in the design methodology of abstracts.
    Bernaiche M; Andary M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 84(2):303; discussion 303. PubMed ID: 12601665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.
    Can OS; Yilmaz AA; Hasdogan M; Alkaya F; Turhan SC; Can MF; Alanoglu Z
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):485-92. PubMed ID: 21037480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critiquing research for use in practice.
    Dale JC
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15867836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.