These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12610434)

  • 1. [Biodegradable meniscus fixations: a comparative biomechanical study].
    Seil R; Rupp S; Jurecka C; Georg T; Kohn D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 12610434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tensile and shear loading stability of all-inside meniscal repairs: an in vitro biomechanical evaluation.
    Brucker PU; Favre P; Puskas GJ; von Campe A; Meyer DC; Koch PP
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Sep; 38(9):1838-44. PubMed ID: 20805413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques.
    Aşík M; Sener N
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Jan; 10(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11819017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meniscal repair devices: a clinical and biomechanical literature review.
    Farng E; Sherman O
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Mar; 20(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 15007316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meniscal screw fixation provides sufficient stability to prevent tears from gapping.
    Dürselen L; Hebisch A; Wagner D; Claes LE; Bauer G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Jan; 22(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 17027130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cyclic testing of meniscal sutures.
    Seil R; Rupp S; Kohn DM
    Arthroscopy; 2000; 16(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 10882446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical testing of suture-based meniscal repair devices containing ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene suture: update 2011.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Bava ED; Drew OR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Jun; 28(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 22317797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elongation and structural properties of meniscal repair using suture techniques in distraction and shear force scenarios: biomechanical evaluation using a cyclic loading protocol.
    Zantop T; Temmig K; Weimann A; Eggers AK; Raschke MJ; Petersen W
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 May; 34(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 16567460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cyclic joint loading can affect the initial stability of meniscal fixation implants.
    Dürselen L; Schneider J; Galler M; Claes LE; Bauer G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2003 Jan; 18(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 12527246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of meniscus compression on the biomechanical properties of repaired meniscal lesions. Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2003.
    Staerke C; Bochwitz C; Groebel KH; Unterhauser F; Becker R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 May; 124(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 14963723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures.
    Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG
    Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of various suture strength factors on behavior of meniscus sutures in cyclic loading conditions].
    Seil R; Rupp S; Jurecka C; Rein R; Kohn D
    Unfallchirurg; 2001 May; 104(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 11413954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of lesion location on fixation strength of the meniscal viper repair system: an in vitro study using porcine menisci.
    Chang HC; Caborn DN; Nyland J; Burden R
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 16581451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2000 Sep; 16(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 10976122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair.
    Hapa O; Akşahin E; Erduran M; Davul S; Havitçioğlu H; LaPrade RF; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):577-80. PubMed ID: 23340094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems.
    Fisher SR; Markel DC; Koman JD; Atkinson TS
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Sep; 10(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 12355304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Bong MR; Romero A; Kubiak E; Iesaka K; Heywood CS; Kummer F; Rosen J; Jazrawi L
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Richards DP
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14716278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new rigid biodegradable anchor for meniscus refixation: biomechanical evaluation.
    Zantop T; Eggers AK; Musahl V; Weimann A; Hassenpflug J; Petersen W
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2004 Jul; 12(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 14689168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repair of peripheral vertical meniscus lesions in porcine menisci: in vitro biomechanical testing of 3 different meniscus repair devices.
    Lee YH; Nyland J; Burden R; Caborn DN
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1074-81. PubMed ID: 23475943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.