351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12610594)
1. Concern about Japan's unclear biotech regulations.
Watanabe KN
Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. UK government caught in GM dilemma.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):957. PubMed ID: 12949540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
Smyth S; McHughen A
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
Marris E
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Chinese agribiotech: Against the grain.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):111-2. PubMed ID: 12634752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns.
König A
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. GM confusion in Brazil.
Bonalume Neto R
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1257-8. PubMed ID: 14595342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. GM labeling in China beset by problems.
Jia H
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):835-6. PubMed ID: 12894183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Action needed to harmonize regulation of low-level presence of biotech traits.
Krueger R; Le Buanec B
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 18259165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic engineering: unnatural selection.
Snow A
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):619. PubMed ID: 12904767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biotech crops' seal of safety does not convince skeptics.
Keogh B
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Apr; 104(7):498-501. PubMed ID: 22440678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
Oeschger MP; Silva CE
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elements of precaution: recommendations for the regulation of food biotechnology in Canada.
Royal Society of Canada
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2001 Sep; 64(1-2):1-210. PubMed ID: 11592267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Transgenic harvest.
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7316):633-4. PubMed ID: 20930796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Italy employs further GMO delay tactics.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):346. PubMed ID: 12665808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. US academia held accountable for GM products.
Powell K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):720-1. PubMed ID: 12833077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
