These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. NIH responds to critics on peer review. Wadman M Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk. Fenning TM Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):393. PubMed ID: 14749800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data. Nicholson JK Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer review: Revise rules on conflicts of interest. Žliobaitė I; Fortelius M Nature; 2016 Nov; 539(7628):168. PubMed ID: 27830803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Discourse among referees and editors would help. Lahiri DK Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Academics seek to cast peer review as a public service. Butler D Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6995):7. PubMed ID: 15229573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]