134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12611404)
1. Redefining parenthood.
Halperin-Kaddari R
Calif West Int Law J; 1999; 29(2):313-37. PubMed ID: 12611404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to parenthood and the best interests of the child: a perspective on surrogate motherhood in Jewish and Israeli law.
Shifman P
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):555-68. PubMed ID: 11650205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial techniques of procreation: legal and moral aspects.
Shifman P
Isr Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):600-9. PubMed ID: 14682331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The process of regulating assisted reproductive technologies: what we can learn from our neighbors--what translates and what does not.
Lorio KV
Loyola Law Rev; 1999; 45(2):247-68. PubMed ID: 16622956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Gestation: work for hire or the essence of motherhood? A comparative legal analysis.
Laufer-Ukeles P
Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():91-134. PubMed ID: 14986667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Parenthood by pure intention: assisted reproduction and the functional approach to parentage.
Storrow RF
Hastings Law J; 2002 Mar; 53(3):597-679. PubMed ID: 12680380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in South America and the effect on adoption.
Marques CL
Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):65-91. PubMed ID: 12656082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive technology comes of age.
Andrews LB
Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):375-89. PubMed ID: 12199233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The birds, the bees, and the deep freeze: is there international consensus in the debate over assisted reproductive technologies?
Pitrolo EA
Houst J Int Law; 1996; 19(1):147-206. PubMed ID: 12666682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial reproduction technologies and conflict of laws: an initial approach.
Grammaticaki-Alexiou A
LA Law Rev; 2000; 60(4):1113-21. PubMed ID: 12452137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulating advanced reproductive technologies: a comparative analysis of Jewish and American law.
Povarsky C
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1998; 29(3):409-83. PubMed ID: 12755152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Redefining motherhood: determining legal maternity in gestational surrogacy arrangements.
Larkey AM
Drake Law Rev; 2003; 51(3):605-32. PubMed ID: 15214337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to privacy and assisted reproductive technologies: a comparative study of the law of Germany and the U.S.
Voss AS
N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 2002; 21(2):229-305. PubMed ID: 15212072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. From Baby M. to Jaycee B.: fathers, mothers, and children in the brave new world.
Hale JV
J Contemp Law; 1998; 24(2):335-75. PubMed ID: 12465647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Marriage of Buzzanca: charting a new destiny.
O'Hara MD; Vorzimer AW
West State Univ Law Rev; 1998-1999; 26():25-45. PubMed ID: 12625315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New methods of conception and their legal status.
Pilpel HF
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1985; 3():13-33. PubMed ID: 16100809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Parenthood and Cross-Border Surrogacy: What Is 'New'? The ECtHR's First Advisory Opinion.
Margaria A
Med Law Rev; 2020 May; 28(2):412-425. PubMed ID: 32057071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ever-widening gap between the science of artificial reproductive technology and the laws which govern that technology.
Havins WE; Dalessio JJ
De Paul Law Rev; 1999; 48(4):825-66. PubMed ID: 12484397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The proposed model surrogate parenthood act: a legislative response to the challenges of reproductive technology.
Manus ML
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1996; 29(3):671-773. PubMed ID: 12071207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A trust analysis of a gestational carrier's right to abortion.
Yamamoto K; Moore SA
Fordham Law Rev; 2001 Oct; 70(1):93-186. PubMed ID: 11763875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
