These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Tobacco industry statements in the US Department of Justice lawsuit. Waxman HA Tob Control; 2003 Mar; 12(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 12612372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tobacco industry sponsorships: new image belies its deadly product. Malone RE J Emerg Nurs; 2004 Apr; 30(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 15039681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Heat-not-Burn Tobacco Products: Tobacco Industry Claims No Substitute for Science. Jenssen BP; Walley SC; McGrath-Morrow SA Pediatrics; 2018 Jan; 141(1):. PubMed ID: 29233936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: how do they compare? Dorfman L; Cheyne A; Friedman LC; Wadud A; Gottlieb M PLoS Med; 2012; 9(6):e1001241. PubMed ID: 22723745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. European Parliament slammed over tobacco talks. Hyde R Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9563):731-2. PubMed ID: 17340681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mistrusting companies, mistrusting the tobacco industry: clarifying the context of tobacco prevention efforts that focus on the tobacco industry. Thrasher JF; Jackson C J Health Soc Behav; 2006 Dec; 47(4):406-22. PubMed ID: 17240928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. India: advocates hit back at smokeless industry. Simpson D Tob Control; 2007 Jun; 16(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 17565126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The divergence between scientific and legal approaches concerning the cause of effects of tobacco use under Spanish law. Arcos Vieira ML Med Law; 2010 Jun; 29(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 22462282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effects of menthol as an additive in tobacco products and the need for regulation]. Kahnert S; Nair U; Mons U; Pötschke-Langer M Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2012 Mar; 55(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 22373857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Science, industry, and tobacco harm reduction: a case study of tobacco industry scientists' involvement in the National Cancer Institute's Smoking and Health Program, 1964-1980. Parascandola M Public Health Rep; 2005; 120(3):338-49. PubMed ID: 16134578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Bero L Annu Rev Public Health; 2003; 24():267-88. PubMed ID: 12415145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tobacco documents reveal questionable professional recertification by industry menthol expert. Stevens D; Glantz S Tob Control; 2016 May; 25(3):364. PubMed ID: 25967941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Could product regulation result in less hazardous tobacco products? Myers ML Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 3(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 12825432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Could science-based regulation make tobacco products less addictive? Henningfield JE; Zeller M Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 3(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 12825431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The cigarette controversy. Cummings KM; Brown A; O'Connor R Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(6):1070-6. PubMed ID: 17548665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Policy options for extending standardized tobacco packaging. Hoek J; Gendall P Bull World Health Organ; 2017 Oct; 95(10):726-728. PubMed ID: 29147047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A call to reduce harm from tobacco pack marketing and bolster consumer health protection in New Zealand. Thomson G; Wilson N; Hoek J N Z Med J; 2008 Oct; 121(1284):98-101. PubMed ID: 18953396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]