These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12612771)
1. Cervical shaping in curved root canals: comparison of the efficiency of two endodontic instruments. Busquim SS; dos Santos M Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2002; 16(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 12612771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative assessment of the effects of Gates-Glidden, Largo, LA-Axxess, and New Brazilian Drill CPdrill on coronal pre-enlargement: cone-beam computed tomographic analysis. Flores CB; Montagner F; Gomes BP; Dotto GN; da Silva Schmitz M J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 24666914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Gates-Glidden, LA Axxess and orifice shaper burs on the cervical dentin thickness and root canal area of mandibular molars. Duarte MA; Bernardes RA; Ordinola-Zapata R; Vasconcelos BC; Bramante CM; Moraes IG Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 21519644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occurrence of Dentinal Microcracks in Severely Curved Root Canals with ProTaper Universal, WaveOne, and ProTaper Next File Systems. Li SH; Lu Y; Song D; Zhou X; Zheng QH; Gao Y; Huang DM J Endod; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1875-9. PubMed ID: 26386948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of ProTaper Universal, Endoflare, Revo-S, HyFlex coronal flaring instruments, and Gates Glidden drills on crack formation. Arslan H; Karataş E; Capar ID; Ozsu D; Doğanay E J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1681-3. PubMed ID: 25127932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination. Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the effects of TripleGates and Gates-Glidden burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal area by using cone beam computed tomography. Sousa K; Andrade-Junior CV; Silva JM; Duarte MA; De-Deus G; Silva EJ J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 26018308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with Gates-Glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences. Coutinho-Filho T; De-Deus G; Gurgel-Filho ED; Rocha-Lima AC; Dias KR; Barbosa CA Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 18425240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring. Isom TL; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC J Endod; 1995 Jul; 21(7):368-71. PubMed ID: 7499977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments. Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual dentin thickness in mesial roots of mandibular molars prepared with Lightspeed rotary instruments and Gates-Glidden reamers. Zuckerman O; Katz A; Pilo R; Tamse A; Fuss Z Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Sep; 96(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 12973293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of four instruments on coronal pre-enlargement by using cone beam computed tomography. Sanfelice CM; da Costa FB; Reis Só MV; Vier-Pelisser F; Souza Bier CA; Grecca FS J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):858-61. PubMed ID: 20416433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of preparation of oval distal root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium instruments. Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Mühge M; Schäfers F Int Endod J; 2002 Nov; 35(11):919-28. PubMed ID: 12453021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure. Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 15716849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars. van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30446405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study. Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. Kuttler S; McLean A; Dorn S; Fischzang A J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 135(7):903-9. PubMed ID: 15354901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study. Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals. Gagliardi J; Versiani MA; de Sousa-Neto MD; Plazas-Garzon A; Basrani B J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1718-24. PubMed ID: 26321062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]