These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12612771)
21. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography. Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Schäfer E; Schlingemann R Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material. Bodrumlu E; Uzun O; Topuz O; Semiz M J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 74(8):721. PubMed ID: 18845062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effectiveness of the ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 files in removal of gutta-percha root fillings during curved root canal retreatment. Valois CR; Navarro M; Ramos AA; de Castro AJ; Gahyva SM Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11450685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of 2 Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Shaping Root Canals. da Silva Limoeiro AG; Dos Santos AH; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Fontana CE; Gavini G; Freire LG; da Silveira Bueno CE J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):496-9. PubMed ID: 26776939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals. Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of the efficacy of conventional and new retreatment instruments to remove gutta-percha in curved root canals: an ex vivo study. Unal GC; Kaya BU; Taç AG; Keçeci AD Int Endod J; 2009 Apr; 42(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 19220515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endodontic filling removal procedure: an ex vivo comparative study between two rotary techniques. Vale MS; Moreno Mdos S; Silva PM; Botelho TC Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 24346045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Instrumentation of curved root canals: a comparison study. Hudson DA; Remeikis NA; Cura JE J Endod; 1992 Sep; 18(9):448-50. PubMed ID: 9796514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of Cervical and Apical Enlargement Associated with the WaveOne System on the Transportation and Centralization of Endodontic Preparations. Jatahy Ferreira do Amaral RO; Leonardi DP; Gabardo MC; Coelho BS; Oliveira KV; Baratto Filho F J Endod; 2016 Apr; 42(4):626-31. PubMed ID: 26794342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Schäfer E; Vlassis M Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study. Gergi R; Sabbagh C Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the preparation of the coronal part of the mesial canals of lower molars. Sinan A; Georgelin-Gurgel M; Diemer F Odontostomatol Trop; 2011 Mar; 34(133):13-9. PubMed ID: 21682215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey. Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Morphometrical analysis of cleaning capacity of a hybrid instrumentation in mesial flattened root canals. Gonçalves LC; Junior EC; da Frota MF; Marques AA; Garcia Lda F Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 22117715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study. Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals. Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of Mtwo, R-Endo, and D-RaCe retreatment instruments on the incidence of dentinal defects during the removal of root canal filling material. Topçuoğlu HS; Demirbuga S; Tuncay Ö; Pala K; Arslan H; Karataş E J Endod; 2014 Feb; 40(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 24461416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth. Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]