271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12613205)
1. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal defenses to the use of data digits to identify fabricated data.
Walter C; Richards EP
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 12012610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
Klein DF
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Office of Scientific Integrity investigations: the importance of data analysis.
Price AA; Hallum JV
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 16144092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
Willcox BL
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):202. PubMed ID: 1331812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
Price AR
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft responses to misconduct.
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
Scheetz MD
Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Fed Regist; 2005 May; 70(94):28369-400. PubMed ID: 15898182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Second guessing. Is more oversight needed to curb scientific cheating?
Beardsley T
Sci Am; 1991 Jun; 264(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 1650032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed.
Teitelbaum SL
Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
Steinberg NA
South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
Soskolne CL
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.
Dahlberg JE; Davidian NM
Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):713-35. PubMed ID: 20526693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: the origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity--with personal views by ORI's former associate director for investigative oversight.
Price AR
Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):291-319. PubMed ID: 24028479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beautification and fraud.
Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
