153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12613566)
1. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
Proctor RW; Cho YS
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influences of hand posture and hand position on compatibility effects for up-down stimuli mapped to left-right responses: evidence for a hand referent hypothesis.
Cho YS; Proctor RW
Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1301-15. PubMed ID: 12519027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
Cho YS; Proctor RW
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task.
Bae GY; Cho YS; Proctor RW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):746-65. PubMed ID: 18780263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of an initiating action on the up-right/down-left advantage for vertically arrayed stimuli and horizontally arrayed responses.
Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):472-84. PubMed ID: 11318061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial compatibility effects with unimanual and bimanual wheel-rotation responses: an homage to guiard (1983).
Murchison NM; Proctor RW
J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):441-54. PubMed ID: 23972054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
Vu KP; Proctor RW
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
Cho YS; Proctor RW
Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1003-17. PubMed ID: 15675647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
Proctor RW; Vu KP
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
Stins JF; Michaels CF
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Spatial stimulus-response compatibility: presentation of stimuli within one visual hemifield].
Nicoletti R; Anzola GP; Rizzolatti G; Umiltà C
Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1980 Jul; 56(13):1426-31. PubMed ID: 7448039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.
Press C; Bird G; Walsh E; Heyes C
Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18077067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Spatial compatibility and position of the effectors].
Nicoletti R; Umiltà C; Làdavas E
Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1983 Nov; 59(11):1687-92. PubMed ID: 6667310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Manual asymmetries in bimanual reaching: the influence of spatial compatibility and visuospatial attention.
Neely K; Binsted G; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 15629221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of visual cue and response assignment on spatial stimulus coding in stimulus-response compatibility.
Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 21939367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect.
Nicholls ME; Loftus AM; Orr CA; Barre N
Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 18495310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An explanation of orthogonal S-R compatibility effects that vary with hand or response position: the end-state comfort hypothesis.
Lippa Y; Adam JJ
Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jan; 63(1):156-74. PubMed ID: 11304011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual field x response hand interactions and level priming in the processing of laterally presented hierarchical stimuli.
Wendt M; Vietze I; Kluwe RH
Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16901597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
