These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12613676)

  • 1. A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch.
    Soto-Faraco S; Spence C; Fairbank K; Kingstone A; Hillstrom AP; Shapiro K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 12613676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crossmodal links between audition and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.
    Lloyd DM; Merat N; McGlone F; Spence C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Aug; 65(6):901-24. PubMed ID: 14528899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch.
    Auvray M; Gallace A; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Oct; 126(2):79-97. PubMed ID: 17187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target identification.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1938-47. PubMed ID: 20952790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Driver J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1298-319. PubMed ID: 10946716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?
    Chen S; Shi Z; Zang X; Zhu X; Assumpção L; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1682-1694. PubMed ID: 31845105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks.
    Rusconi P; Huber DE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1717-1739. PubMed ID: 29030758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neither backward masking of T2 nor task switching is necessary for the attentional blink.
    Jannati A; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 21327367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data-limited manipulations of T1 difficulty modulate the attentional blink.
    Visser TA; Ohan JL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Jun; 61(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 17665751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modulation of the attentional blink by differential resource allocation.
    Shore DI; Mclaughlin EN; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Dec; 55(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 11768857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory attentional blink: masking the second target is necessary, delayed masking is sufficient.
    Vachon F; Tremblay S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Dec; 59(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 16459898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The attentional blink is not a unitary phenomenon.
    Kawahara J; Enns JT; Di Lollo V
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 16344995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kimura Y; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1176-1195. PubMed ID: 31444699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus localization interferes with stimulus recognition: evidence from an attentional blink paradigm.
    Griffiths G; Herwig A; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 23757511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting within-modality and cross-modality attentional blinks: effects of target-distractor similarity.
    Arnell KM; Jenkins R
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1147-61. PubMed ID: 15751472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The modulation of crossmodal integration by unimodal perceptual grouping: a visuotactile apparent motion study.
    Lyons G; Sanabria D; Vatakis A; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 174(3):510-6. PubMed ID: 16721609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision, audition, and touch: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(12):1292-303. PubMed ID: 11566312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.