These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12614795)
1. The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position. Hartrumpf M; Albes JM; Krempl T; Rudolph V; Wahlers T Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 23(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 12614795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position. Hartrumpf M; Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Pohl M; Albes JM Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 16208612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position. Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs. Kleine P; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Ackermann H; Moritz A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Nov; 124(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 12407375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro hydrodynamic characteristics among three bileaflet valves in the mitral position. Feng Z; Umezu M; Fujimoto T; Tsukahara T; Nurishi M; Kawaguchi D Artif Organs; 2000 May; 24(5):346-54. PubMed ID: 10848675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial in vivo results of the new Medtronic Advantage(TM) bileaflet valve in aortic position and comparison to the SJM. Kleine P; Klesius AA; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Moritz A Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 10(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 12379409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamic performance of bileaflet mechanical heart valves at different implantation angles. Kuan YH; Nguyen VT; Kabinejadian F; Su B; Kim S; Yoganathan AP; Leo HL J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 25799715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrodynamic function of tilting disc prostheses and bileaflet valves in double valve replacement. StrĂ¼ber M; Campbell A; Richard G; Laas J Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1996; 10(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 8817137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numerical investigation on the effect of bileaflet mechanical heart valve's implantation tilting angle and aortic root geometry on intermittent regurgitation and platelet activation. Abbas SS; Nasif MS; Al-Waked R; Meor Said MA Artif Organs; 2020 Feb; 44(2):E20-E39. PubMed ID: 31378963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics. Laas J; Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Sep; 68(3):1096-9. PubMed ID: 10510028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs. Kleine P; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Scherer M; Simon A; Moritz A J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 12479289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of heart rate on the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves' prostheses (St. Jude Medical) in the aortic position and in the opening phase: A computational study. Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):175-90. PubMed ID: 26786673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans. Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H; Perthel M; Wesemeyer D; Laas J J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 10772054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy. Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro pressure drop comparison between two mechanical valve prostheses. Kim SH; Chang BC; Cho BK Yonsei Med J; 1994 Mar; 35(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 8009899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses. Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses. Walker PG; Yoganathan AP Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of pressure recovery in the evaluation of the Omnicarbon tilting disc valve. Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Langebartels G; Steinseifer U; Schmitz-Rode T; Autschbach R Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 54(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 16639678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]