BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12615014)

  • 1. Computerized local dental anesthetic systems: patient and dentist satisfaction.
    Grace EG; Barnes DM; Reid BC; Flores M; George DL
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12615014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient and dentist satisfaction with a computerized local anesthetic injection system.
    Grace EG; Barnes DM; Macek MD; Tatum N
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Sep; 21(9):746-8, 750, 752. PubMed ID: 11199649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A computer-controlled anesthetic delivery system in a periodontal practice: patient satisfaction and acceptance.
    Rosenberg ES
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 11915394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pain perception and utility: a comparison of the syringe and computerized local injection techniques.
    Nicholson JW; Berry TG; Summitt JB; Yuan CH; Witten TM
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 12004696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe.
    Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jul; 205(1):E2; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 18493254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Wand vs. traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors.
    Gibson RS; Allen K; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 11132503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of children's pain reactions and perceptions to AMSA injection using CCLAD versus traditional injections.
    Feda M; Al Amoudi N; Sharaf A; Hanno A; Farsi N; Masoud I; Almushyt A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 20578658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinician guide to patients afraid of dental injections and numbness.
    Armfield JM; Milgrom P
    SAAD Dig; 2011 Jan; 27():33-9. PubMed ID: 21323034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of single tooth anaesthesia by computer-controlled local anaesthetic delivery system (C-CLADS) with a supraperiosteal traditional syringe injection in paediatric dentistry.
    Perugia C; Bartolino M; Docimo R
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Sep; 18(3):221-225. PubMed ID: 29254346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of anesthesia and patient preference using the needle-less jet syringe in pediatric dental practice.
    Munshi AK; Hegde A; Bashir N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 11314212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of the systems used for providing local anesthesia in dentistry--the Wand (Milestone Scientific) and Injex (Rosch)].
    Zarzecka J; Gończowski K; Kesek B; Darczuk D; Zapała J
    Przegl Lek; 2006; 63(12):1304-9. PubMed ID: 17642145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control.
    Friedman MJ; Hochman MN
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Oct; 18(10):995-1000, 1002-3; quiz 1004. PubMed ID: 9533309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children.
    Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 16324138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A painless local-anesthetic technique that works.
    Charlton GS
    Dent Econ; 1994 Oct; 84(10):97. PubMed ID: 8612885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is it the injection device or the anxiety experienced that causes pain during dental local anaesthesia?
    Kuscu OO; Akyuz S
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Mar; 18(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 18237297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The injection procedure as a source of stress for dentists.
    Peltier B; Dower J; Simon JF; Chambers D
    Gen Dent; 1995; 43(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 23087971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of computerized delivery of intrasulcular anesthetic in primary molars.
    Ashkenazi M; Blumer S; Eli I
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Oct; 136(10):1418-25. PubMed ID: 16255467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of local and topical anesthesia use by pediatric dentists in the United States.
    Kohli K; Ngan P; Crout R; Linscott CC
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 11447962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry.
    Asarch T; Allen K; Petersen B; Beiraghi S
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(7):421-4. PubMed ID: 10633514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Painless dentistry. Fact or fiction?
    Anderson K
    CDS Rev; 1998; 91(5):14-21. PubMed ID: 9760883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.