These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12615021)

  • 1. The effects of filling techniques and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities.
    Figueiredo Reis A; Giannini M; Ambrosano GM; Chan DC
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 12615021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of cavity size and filling method on the bonding to Class I cavities.
    He Z; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Ikeda M; Tagami J
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Dec; 10(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 19189675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in Class I cavities.
    He Z; Shimada Y; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 16725190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of filling technique and curing mode on the bond strengths of composite cores to pulpal floor dentin.
    Ariyoshi M; Nikaido T; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Dent Mater J; 2010 Oct; 29(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 20733260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives' bond strength to enamel and dentin.
    Reis AF; Oliveira MT; Giannini M; De Goes MF; Rueggeberg FA
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):700-6. PubMed ID: 14653283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of indirect restorations using different resin coating protocols.
    Medina AD; de Paula AB; de Fucio SB; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23338259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of oil contamination on in vitro bond strength of bonding agents to dental substrates.
    Matos AB; Oliveira DC; Vieira SN; Netto NG; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 18578177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin.
    Nikolaenko SA; Lohbauer U; Roggendorf M; Petschelt A; Dasch W; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 15134946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength.
    Yoshikawa T; Sano H; Burrow MF; Tagami J; Pashley DH
    J Dent Res; 1999 Apr; 78(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 10326734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent evaluation of composite internal adaptation and bond strength in a class-I cavity.
    Bakhsh TA; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Mandurah MM; Hariri I; Alsayed EZ; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23044389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between degree of conversion, resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives.
    Hass V; Dobrovolski M; Zander-Grande C; Martins GC; Gordillo LA; Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L; Gomes OM; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):921-8. PubMed ID: 23830512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Four-year water degradation of a total-etch and two self-etching adhesives bonded to dentin.
    Abdalla AI; Feilzer AJ
    J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):611-7. PubMed ID: 18514996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Slow progression of dentin bond degradation during one-year water storage under simulated pulpal pressure.
    Belli R; Sartori N; Peruchi LD; Guimarães JC; Araújo E; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Lohbauer U
    J Dent; 2010 Oct; 38(10):802-10. PubMed ID: 20599465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.