These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12615602)

  • 1. Design and interpretation of studies of differential exposure measurement error.
    White E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Mar; 157(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 12615602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement error in biomarkers: sources, assessment, and impact on studies.
    White E
    IARC Sci Publ; 2011; (163):143-61. PubMed ID: 22997860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.
    Flegal KM; Keyl PM; Nieto FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 134(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 1746532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple Sensitivity Analysis for Differential Measurement Error.
    VanderWeele TJ; Li Y
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 188(10):1823-1829. PubMed ID: 31145435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Varied forms of bias due to nondifferential error in measuring exposure.
    Brenner H; Loomis D
    Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 7986865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Results on differential and dependent measurement error of the exposure and the outcome using signed directed acyclic graphs.
    VanderWeele TJ; Hernán MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 175(12):1303-10. PubMed ID: 22569106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misclassification bias arising from random error in exposure measurement: implications for dual measurement strategies.
    Brenner H; Blettner M
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Sep; 138(6):453-61. PubMed ID: 8213750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study design for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
    Armstrong B
    Sci Total Environ; 1995 Jun; 168(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 7481737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use and limitations of dual measurements in correcting for nondifferential exposure misclassification.
    Brenner H
    Epidemiology; 1992 May; 3(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 1591320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The impact of incorrectly-measured variables when mixed with precisely measured variables on the study of validity in epidemiological research].
    Yang MX; Zhou YB; Jiang QW
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 28(8):810-3. PubMed ID: 18080573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation of Random Differential Periodontitis Outcome Misclassification with Perfect Specificity.
    Alshihayb TS; Heaton B
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2022 Apr; 7(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 33899555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Instrumental variables vs. grouping approach for reducing bias due to measurement error.
    Batistatou E; McNamee R
    Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 8. PubMed ID: 22462115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correcting for the bias caused by exposure measurement error in epidemiological studies.
    Fahey MT; Forbes AB; Hodge AM
    Respirology; 2014 Oct; 19(7):979-84. PubMed ID: 25123473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the effects of continuous and discrete covariate mismeasurement, with emphasis on the dichotomization of mismeasured predictors.
    Gustafson P; Le Nhu D
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):878-87. PubMed ID: 12495142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When measurement errors correlate with truth: surprising effects of nondifferential misclassification.
    Wacholder S
    Epidemiology; 1995 Mar; 6(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 7742402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Study on the impact of exposure misclassification on the validity of a study].
    Zhou YB; Yang MX; Jiang QW
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 26(11):919-23. PubMed ID: 16676619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of incomplete exposure assessment on epidemiologic dose-response analyses.
    Loomis DP; Savitz DA
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1994 Jun; 20(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 7973492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analytic results on the bias due to nondifferential misclassification of a binary mediator.
    Ogburn EL; VanderWeele TJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 22930481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of non-differential measurement error on bias, precision and power in Mendelian randomization studies.
    Pierce BL; VanderWeele TJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 41(5):1383-93. PubMed ID: 23045203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.